Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Religious Debates
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2005, 06:14 PM
Bright-ness' Shadow Offline
Title:Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 12,940
Frubals: 250143
Bright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfast
Bright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfastBright-ness' Shadow eats frubals for breakfast
Default Research into prayer, fertility link now doubted

Research into prayer, fertility link now doubted

Complete article

By Julie Sevrens Lyons

Mercury News


Quote:
Skeptics have called it the ``Miracle Study'' -- findings by scientists that simple prayers could dramatically boost fertility in women.

Published in a respected medical journal by a Capitola researcher, a department head at Columbia University and a Korean scientist also based at Columbia, it immediately attracted the attention of the news media, religious groups and couples desperately trying to conceive.

``Women who were prayed for became pregnant twice as often as those who did not have people praying for them,'' trumpeted the New York Times in 2001. Other media, including the Mercury News, picked up the story.

But now, three years after the study first suggested that a higher power could influence pregnancy rates, critics are calling it all a sham, a black eye to the research community and proof that medical studies aren't always what they appear to be.

Many in the medical field are saying that the only miracle about the study is that it was published to begin with. They wonder if the research was ever conducted at all.

As the controversy rages, the Bay Area researcher is en route to a California prison camp on an unrelated fraud conviction. The second scientist recently took his name off the study. The third quietly left Columbia. The government conducted its own investigation and determined the study violated federal research guidelines.

The authors have denied wrongdoing. No one has been able to replicate their results -- but neither have they proved that the team invented data.

Still, the reputations of Columbia and the Journal of Reproductive Medicine have been sullied in a very public way. And, more important, critics say the study has breached the public's faith in the scientific process.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Similar Threads


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM.


© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.