Christians, please give me some proof/evidence that Christianity is true.

[HoldemDB9]

I know there are plenty of people out there who follow a religion without seeing any proof or evidence. I've argued with those idiots plenty of times and I think its almost impossible to change their minds. I think we all agree that they are strongly deluded.

But I'm talking about the more intelligent Christians (like on here). I've heard plenty of people say on here that they would not believe without sufficient evidence. The problem though, is that I've heard Richard Dawkin's say over and over again, that there is not one shred of evidence that supports that Christianity is true. And I know, he knows what he is talking about. Now Ill admit, I have not searched for any evidence my self and I have just took Mr Dawkins word for it.

So, please provide me with some evidence which supports Christianity being true.

[Dunemeister]

You might read Antony Flew's There Is a God. Flew used to be the world's most prominent atheologian. Indeed, he inspired the recent crop of atheologians including Dawkins. But has been convinced by science and reason that there is a god, and he's got some choice words for Dawkins, Dennett, et al. He's not a Christian by any stretch. He hasn't been converted. His newly adopted position is a rational one. So you might start there. If you can see some basis for movement after reading that, perhaps a specifically Christian argument might be appropriate.

[stephenw]

Originally Posted by HoldemDB9

So, please provide me with some evidence which supports Christianity being true.

Why?
The only evidence that will have any value, you will find yourself. In my opinion passively taking what someone else tells you as your own will never lead you to knowing anything worthwhile.
You'll never find treasure if you don't look. It'd be like expecting to win the lottery without buying a ticket.

[Charity]

I would give you evidence but God is too big to place in "your" hands.

[Jeremy Mason]

Originally Posted by Charity

I would give you evidence but God is too big to place in "your" hands.

I think a seed will fit.

[HoldemDB9]

Think I got what I was looking for. Looks like there is no evidence.

Thanks.

[methylatedghosts]

Originally Posted by HoldemDB9

. The problem though, is that I've heard Richard Dawkin's say over and over again, that there is not one shred of evidence that supports that Christianity is true. And I know, he knows what he is talking about. Now Ill admit, I have not searched for any evidence my self and I have just took Mr Dawkins word for it.

You've just gone and done what many people say Christians do with the bible. Some people will claim that Christians have heard their preacher say over and over again that here is what is true. And they know, that their preachers know what they're talking about. But they haven't searched for any evidence themselves, they've just taken their preacher's word for it.

[Jeremy Mason]

Originally Posted by HoldemDB9

Think I got what I was looking for. Looks like there is no evidence.

Thanks.

You were looking for no evidence?

[UltraViolet]

Originally Posted by HoldemDB9

I know there are plenty of people out there who follow a religion without seeing any proof or evidence. I've argued with those idiots plenty of times and I think its almost impossible to change their minds. I think we all agree that they are strongly deluded.

But I'm talking about the more intelligent Christians (like on here). I've heard plenty of people say on here that they would not believe without sufficient evidence. The problem though, is that I've heard Richard Dawkin's say over and over again, that there is not one shred of evidence that supports that Christianity is true. And I know, he knows what he is talking about. Now Ill admit, I have not searched for any evidence my self and I have just took Mr Dawkins word for it.

So, please provide me with some evidence which supports Christianity being true.

Is it really any different when one person take's "one's" word for it,
than when another person takes another "one's" word for it?