Why is it always the Mormons? (Jesus Christ, Buddhism, beliefs, LDS)

[doppelgänger]

Originally Posted by Scott1

I appreciate you letting me have an opinon.

I said in Post 113 you can interpret it however you want. That's what I do. But if your interpretation is that Peter is not the "rock" or the foundation of Papal authority, you're still not "Catholic" on that issue. Nothing wrong with that, of course. Join the club.

[Fish-Hunter]

Originally Posted by doppelgänger

I said in Post 113 you can interpret it however you want. That's what I do. But if your interpretation is that Peter is not the "rock" or the foundation of Papal authority, you're still not "Catholic" on that issue. Nothing wrong with that, of course. Join the club.

You sure know you religions! . Can a Christian be a Roman Catholic Christian and reject Papal authority? Doesn't that make that Christian a protestor or Protestant at that point? Are you guys familar with the Council of Trent?

[Scott1]

Originally Posted by doppelgänger

Join the club.

Hehe... thanks.

[jonny]

Originally Posted by Fluffy

I'm glad that it is indeed helpful. I've offered wondered whether it is too heavy handed or not (like the rest of the mod team, I'm very much for light moderation) but if helps create the right atmosphere then that is great. I have been on specific religion forums before (Christian, Muslim, e.t.c.) where they have had proselytism sub-forums wherein the forum religion is invited to try and convert those in that forum. For example, a pagan forum would be specifically for proselytising to pagans. It is a system that boggles my mind somewhat.

I appreciate the no proselytizing rule also. I've been on some foru.ms that only allow non-Christians to participate in order to proselytize to them. The only forums I frequent these days is religious forums and religiousforums. They are the only places I feel comfortable discussing religion (politics, on the other hand, is a different story).

[Apex]

Originally Posted by jonny

I appreciate the no proselytizing rule also. I've been on some foru.ms that only allow non-Christians to participate in order to proselytize to them. The only forums I frequent these days is religious forums and religiousforums. They are the only places I feel comfortable discussing religion (politics, on the other hand, is a different story).

Lol, that was christianforums. Thats where I came from.They changed the name briefly to foru.ms. The funny thing though, is that during the time it was named foru.ms was when it was in a "open" stage where there were no "christian" only sections and non-christians were being allowed on staff. Of course the ChristianTM's were throwing a fit and the owner sold it to some internet money making guru guy who turned back into the bigotry infested hell hole it was before. They also just changed its look, it now looks absolutely awful.

[Isabella Lecour]

It's a direct relationship to who buys Chick Tracks.

[doppelgänger]

Originally Posted by Isabella Lecour

It's a direct relationship to who buys Chick Tracks.

I prefer the Cthulhu version.

Off The Beaten Path: "The Death Cookie," and Other Tales