Why is it always the Mormons? (Jesus Christ, Buddhism, beliefs, LDS) - Page 10

Fish-Hunter · #91 05-08-2008, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wandered Off

If you don't believe Joseph Smith, why do you want to talk about Mormonism?

I don't. That's why we are limiting our debate with the 13 letters of Paul, and the book of Acts in regards to Paul on the LDS Beliefs and Bible thread. Keep up with that thread. Remember, a Mormon created that thread to debate with me.

silvermoon383 · #92 05-08-2008, 11:04 AM

Because he thinks that we're hell-bent sinners unless we're exactly the same as he is in thought and action.

Fish-Hunter · #93 05-08-2008, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silvermoon383

Because he thinks that we're hell-bent sinners unless we're exactly the same as he is in thought and action.

Go back to the letters of Paul, because the Bible is your friend.

MidnightBlue · #94 05-08-2008, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish-Hunter

If you don't believe in God, why do you want to talk about theology?

If you believe in god, how can you have an opinion about atheism?

Religion is interesting and ubiquitous. And I wasn't always an atheist.

However, I don't find it very interesting when you dodge my point by questioning my motives for discussing it.

Fish-Hunter · #95 05-08-2008, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MidnightBlue

If you believe in god, how can you have an opinion about atheism?

2 Corinthians 10:5:
We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.

mball1297 · #96 05-08-2008, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish-Hunter

2 Corinthians 10:5:
We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.

Interesting...now maybe you can answer the question.

Fish-Hunter · #97 05-08-2008, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mball1297

Interesting...now maybe you can answer the question.

I'm sorry, what was the question again? I will stay on for 5 more mintues and sign out for the rest of the day. Have a great rest of the day!

Scott1 · #98 05-08-2008, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doppelgänger

That's not what I understand to be the "official" Roman Catholic answer.

Catholic Encyclopedia is not "official".

doppelgänger · #99 05-08-2008, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mball1297

The main question is "Do you pronounce the "h" when you say "historian"? If you do, then there's no reason for "an" instead of "a", as the "n" only serves to make the transition from one vowel to another more fluid, i.e. from "a" to the "i" in historian.

No, the main question is whether my Scott Foresman says both are correct, so I can hide behind an argument by appeal to authority rather than change my habit in the face of your very reasonable and reasoned argument.

I find mine an happier road to travel.