Creation vs. Evolution (Earth, Eden, genesis, eternal, bible)

[inca]

Einstein said: "science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind". : : : ...... :goodjob:
In Chinese language "tempter" is the ideogram for devil + 2 trees + covered. Interesting the fact Ezekiel 28 : 13 to 20 compares the cocky attitude of Tyrus king with the cherub in Eden who sinned against god. In verses 14 and 16 the Hebrew equivalent of protector or the one who "covered" was included. In Chinese "create" is depicted with the symbols for dust (mud)+alive+mouth+ walking which reminds us the Biblical episode of using clay in the Adamus experiment and he became alive after "soul" was insuflated and the use of Hebrew "neshama" means "breathing". In Chinese Devil is garden(field)+alive+secret+man(son) while Supreme Being is the association between emperor+above.
www.creationism.org/csshs/v06n2p04.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v07n4p24.htm
More about languages and evolution inspiring science fiction :mrgreen: :
www.creationism.org/csshs/v13n2p27.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v12n4p25.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v15n4p18.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v16n4p24.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v14n2p23.htm

[inca]

Einstein said: "science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind". : : : ...... :goodjob:
In Chinese language "tempter" is the ideogram for devil + 2 trees + covered. Interesting the fact Ezekiel 28 : 13 to 20 compares the cocky attitude of Tyrus king with the cherub in Eden who sinned against god. In verses 14 and 16 the Hebrew equivalent of protector or the one who "covered" was included. In Chinese "create" is depicted with the symbols for dust (mud)+alive+mouth+ walking which reminds us the Biblical episode of using clay in the Adamus experiment and he became alive after "soul" was insuflated and the use of Hebrew "neshama" means "breathing". In Chinese Devil is garden(field)+alive+secret+man(son) while Supreme Being is the association between emperor+above.
www.creationism.org/csshs/v06n2p04.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v07n4p24.htm
More about languages and evolution inspiring science fiction :mrgreen: :
www.creationism.org/csshs/v13n2p27.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v12n4p25.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v15n4p18.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v16n4p24.htm
www.creationism.org/csshs/v14n2p23.htm

[inca]

In one of the sites it's mentioned the Logos, Verb or Word of God. This is not just a concept coming from John 1:1. It's even remembered in the Popul Vuh of Quiche people.
Please, Mr Q, it's confirmed your "confirmations" mean nothing and your QI is absent. Come now and "ramble" your bad opinions against Joseph Campbell too. Would it be a surprise? Not at all! I really LOVE your virulent messages and tactic, you glue something I post and make an almost monosyllabic uh-oh-uh-oh stummering statement in one single sentence, repeat the same a fistful of times and then, MR Q has achieved grandiloquent intelligent & scientific paragraph with a bunch of pertinent info. HE-HE!

[inca]

In one of the sites it's mentioned the Logos, Verb or Word of God. This is not just a concept coming from John 1:1. It's even remembered in the Popul Vuh of Quiche people.
Please, Mr Q, it's confirmed your "confirmations" mean nothing and your QI is absent. Come now and "ramble" your bad opinions against Joseph Campbell too. Would it be a surprise? Not at all! I really LOVE your virulent messages and tactic, you glue something I post and make an almost monosyllabic uh-oh-uh-oh stummering statement in one single sentence, repeat the same a fistful of times and then, MR Q has achieved grandiloquent intelligent & scientific paragraph with a bunch of pertinent info. HE-HE!

[inca]

Oba-oba-oba! Don't tell me. I suspect Mr. Q following message won't add too much to the theme here. Now he will probably change his tactic and will say something very very very bright. For example a detailed examination of MY tactics. Don't bother. We all know it. I wrote a synthesis of my thought and set many sites in case somebody else wants to have many details. Sometimes I don't write anything at all and I just quote the sites. Something else to add? Oh yes, I know, your personal opinion about me. C'mon, spit it out, I know you wanna do a massage to my ego paying me the attention we all deserve.....

[inca]

Oba-oba-oba! Don't tell me. I suspect Mr. Q following message won't add too much to the theme here. Now he will probably change his tactic and will say something very very very bright. For example a detailed examination of MY tactics. Don't bother. We all know it. I wrote a synthesis of my thought and set many sites in case somebody else wants to have many details. Sometimes I don't write anything at all and I just quote the sites. Something else to add? Oh yes, I know, your personal opinion about me. C'mon, spit it out, I know you wanna do a massage to my ego paying me the attention we all deserve.....

[inca]

Spiritual Son: for a 3 pages discussion about Cain and his "mark" please go to:
http://forums.atlantisrising.com/ubb...ML/000569.html
Mr. Beauman and myself (Oscar) discussed the issue several times in that forum.

[inca]

Spiritual Son: for a 3 pages discussion about Cain and his "mark" please go to:
http://forums.atlantisrising.com/ubb...ML/000569.html
Mr. Beauman and myself (Oscar) discussed the issue several times in that forum.

[(Q)]

Everything else is based upon scientific facts. Has anybody hear an unknown guy say "I wanna see the math" Allow us to laugh! The poor old decrepit guy doesn't even know how to multiply! If he wanna know, he shall do his homework, don't you agree???

Hardly a scientific fact, you make another ridiculous claim regarding statistics without citing a source or showing the math. If you can’t produce the numbers, then shut up.

[(Q)]

Everything else is based upon scientific facts. Has anybody hear an unknown guy say "I wanna see the math" Allow us to laugh! The poor old decrepit guy doesn't even know how to multiply! If he wanna know, he shall do his homework, don't you agree???

Hardly a scientific fact, you make another ridiculous claim regarding statistics without citing a source or showing the math. If you can’t produce the numbers, then shut up.