Creation vs. Evolution (Earth, Eden, genesis, eternal, bible)

[inca]

He added a wish: <<proof of life elsewhere - preferably intelligent, though I'd settle for anything that can put a couple of cells together. There are indications that the first may be in sight - and I've been expecting number two 'real soon now' for the past five years. As for the third - well, your guess is as good as mine." (from the 1998 "Egogram") >>
Well, he probably isn't aware of Sumerian tablets or uses his right to disagree.
www.sitchin.com/adam.htm
These designs were not invented by modern authors as the symbol of Ptah (Egyptian god).

But it's interesting the fact he joined Stanley Kubrick to make his film 2001 Space O. and the idea of the black monolith "helping" the evolution. He said "any technology advanced enough is not distinguished from magic" (Profiles of the Future, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1984). The alien object imagined by Paul Davies is described in his book "Are we alone" (Basic Books, 1995, page 42). When the Bible Code was shown to Kubrick he reckoned "it's like 2001 monolith".

[inca]

He added a wish: <<proof of life elsewhere - preferably intelligent, though I'd settle for anything that can put a couple of cells together. There are indications that the first may be in sight - and I've been expecting number two 'real soon now' for the past five years. As for the third - well, your guess is as good as mine." (from the 1998 "Egogram") >>
Well, he probably isn't aware of Sumerian tablets or uses his right to disagree.
www.sitchin.com/adam.htm
These designs were not invented by modern authors as the symbol of Ptah (Egyptian god).

But it's interesting the fact he joined Stanley Kubrick to make his film 2001 Space O. and the idea of the black monolith "helping" the evolution. He said "any technology advanced enough is not distinguished from magic" (Profiles of the Future, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1984). The alien object imagined by Paul Davies is described in his book "Are we alone" (Basic Books, 1995, page 42). When the Bible Code was shown to Kubrick he reckoned "it's like 2001 monolith".

[(Q)]

Inca

*WHOOOOSH - hand moving over head*

Nope, didn't understand a word of your post.

He's right many UFO sightings are indeed hoaxes.

Others are explained by natural phenomenae. None were visiting aliens.

Stanley Kubrick to make his film 2001 Space O. and the idea of the black monolith "helping" the evolution.

He shows the duality of man when man discovers and masters the use of the tool and who eventually becomes a slave to it.

[(Q)]

Inca

*WHOOOOSH - hand moving over head*

Nope, didn't understand a word of your post.

He's right many UFO sightings are indeed hoaxes.

Others are explained by natural phenomenae. None were visiting aliens.

Stanley Kubrick to make his film 2001 Space O. and the idea of the black monolith "helping" the evolution.

He shows the duality of man when man discovers and masters the use of the tool and who eventually becomes a slave to it.

[painted wolf]

ever hear of the 'old man on the mountain'... a sad to say recently departed rock formation here in my home state of New Hampshire... when looked at from the right angle five rock ledges would line up perfectly to form the profile of a man.

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/whites/old_man.html

nature makes some remarkable things.. we also have Indian Head rock right down the road... another natural rock formation that looks like a person.

http://www.allroutes.to/profilesandfaces/

we are quite literally surrounded by faces...
so pointing out strange shadows on other planets or eaven here on earth isn't much proof for me... you see I've seen it done already.

as for Mayan blood sacrifice... if your hyperdimentional beings like vergins and teenagers then they must have been disapointed with the Mayans...
Most of thier blood sacrifice was done by adults and members of royalty with the occasional sacrifical captive warriors tossed in for variety... not virgins or teenagers.

wa:-do

[painted wolf]

ever hear of the 'old man on the mountain'... a sad to say recently departed rock formation here in my home state of New Hampshire... when looked at from the right angle five rock ledges would line up perfectly to form the profile of a man.

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/whites/old_man.html

nature makes some remarkable things.. we also have Indian Head rock right down the road... another natural rock formation that looks like a person.

http://www.allroutes.to/profilesandfaces/

we are quite literally surrounded by faces...
so pointing out strange shadows on other planets or eaven here on earth isn't much proof for me... you see I've seen it done already.

as for Mayan blood sacrifice... if your hyperdimentional beings like vergins and teenagers then they must have been disapointed with the Mayans...
Most of thier blood sacrifice was done by adults and members of royalty with the occasional sacrifical captive warriors tossed in for variety... not virgins or teenagers.

wa:-do

[inca]

The occasional sacrifice after a while meant thousands of people who had to be slaughtered per year. In the beginning the Nahuatl and Quiche people were selective.
Your point is correct, we don't have to believe every rock or mountain with a face. Yet when the specific game of shadows and light strike in certain day like equinoxes, solstices, eclipses and there are plateaus artificially created and different kind of stones were used to make "sits" to stand to the right distance and when the whole place presents dozens of images representing human races and different animals, the thing is completely different. That's why I say anthropologist and archeologist Daniel Ruzo had to examine the place for many years as others did with Nazca lines. No simple erosion but artificial images. Also we need to know the statues in certian communities were not statues as depicted by Egyptians, Greeks and other people. In Mesoamerica and South America they prefered to "hide" the monuments and play more with shadows and light in "sacred days".
Q: I knew that almost 75 years old brain doesn't know anything about anything in science field. But now we know he doesn't know anything about movies either!!!! May anyone help his arthritic brain and advice him to buy amagazine specialized in the 7th art explaining the film? Buy CINEFLEX, number 85, cost 9.50 cents. He can start reading from page 71.
R U "talkin' 2 ME?????

[inca]

The occasional sacrifice after a while meant thousands of people who had to be slaughtered per year. In the beginning the Nahuatl and Quiche people were selective.
Your point is correct, we don't have to believe every rock or mountain with a face. Yet when the specific game of shadows and light strike in certain day like equinoxes, solstices, eclipses and there are plateaus artificially created and different kind of stones were used to make "sits" to stand to the right distance and when the whole place presents dozens of images representing human races and different animals, the thing is completely different. That's why I say anthropologist and archeologist Daniel Ruzo had to examine the place for many years as others did with Nazca lines. No simple erosion but artificial images. Also we need to know the statues in certian communities were not statues as depicted by Egyptians, Greeks and other people. In Mesoamerica and South America they prefered to "hide" the monuments and play more with shadows and light in "sacred days".
Q: I knew that almost 75 years old brain doesn't know anything about anything in science field. But now we know he doesn't know anything about movies either!!!! May anyone help his arthritic brain and advice him to buy amagazine specialized in the 7th art explaining the film? Buy CINEFLEX, number 85, cost 9.50 cents. He can start reading from page 71.
R U "talkin' 2 ME?????

[inca]

...of course he can't and won't understand me. He doesn't even understand a movie Clarke had written back in 1948 in a short story! Tell that idiot to check "The Sentinel" and the discovery of a crystalline pyramid (oh-oh, like Mayas, Moches and Egyptians, wowowwowaw!) erected on top of a remote lunar plateu millions of years before and shielded through the ages by an invisible force field.
"Duality" my a....s.

[inca]

...of course he can't and won't understand me. He doesn't even understand a movie Clarke had written back in 1948 in a short story! Tell that idiot to check "The Sentinel" and the discovery of a crystalline pyramid (oh-oh, like Mayas, Moches and Egyptians, wowowwowaw!) erected on top of a remote lunar plateu millions of years before and shielded through the ages by an invisible force field.
"Duality" my a....s.