|
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#261
05-15-2004, 10:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
inca
I didn't just quote Hoagland site but other scientists Hoagland is a serious nutcase, crank, kook and is the furthest thing from being a scientist. Dr. Tom Van Flandern believes the same Oh yes, we mustn’t forget this idiot. He and Hoagland have done more to damage the reputation of science than anyone. These two have been refuted time and again yet they continue to be a scourge of the scientific community. If you actually believe these guys, then you are as nutty as they. 
|
|
#262
05-15-2004, 10:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
inca
I didn't just quote Hoagland site but other scientists Hoagland is a serious nutcase, crank, kook and is the furthest thing from being a scientist. Dr. Tom Van Flandern believes the same Oh yes, we mustn’t forget this idiot. He and Hoagland have done more to damage the reputation of science than anyone. These two have been refuted time and again yet they continue to be a scourge of the scientific community. If you actually believe these guys, then you are as nutty as they.
|
|
#263
05-16-2004, 11:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
sorry, I dont base my world-view on movies...
as for Clark... he's a big force in debunking the paranormal... "Arthur C Clarks mysterious world" and "world of strange powers" were a great shows... He was especally amused by the 'UFO culture' ... As for the Mayas... they belived that theire were four previous races... monkies, Iguanas, and two that were totaly wiped out. They also think that we are due to be wiped out soon... of cource they also belived that if you didn't offer up human blood to the gods that the sun wouldn't rise... wa:-do
|
|
#264
05-16-2004, 11:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
sorry, I dont base my world-view on movies...
as for Clark... he's a big force in debunking the paranormal... "Arthur C Clarks mysterious world" and "world of strange powers" were a great shows... He was especally amused by the 'UFO culture' ... As for the Mayas... they belived that theire were four previous races... monkies, Iguanas, and two that were totaly wiped out. They also think that we are due to be wiped out soon... of cource they also belived that if you didn't offer up human blood to the gods that the sun wouldn't rise... wa:-do
|
|
#265
05-17-2004, 10:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Q: accusations have to be proved. If I say Hawkins made an idiotic commentary (which is not the same as saying he's an idiot), I backed up what I said using the same math probabilities and his opposition regarding Thorne's hypothesis to stablish his own particular taste. So, it doesn't surprise me that you say you hate the scientists or specialists and consider everything they write is 100 inaccurate. If I say the same regarding any scientists I would be an idiot. ...like you are.
Painted Wolf:I don't base my views on films, if you can't understand the difference between an EXAMPLE of what I'm trying to post...you're mistake. Yet, you got a good point in saying Mayas gods demanded blood. I tell you the reason: Mayas never knew what they knew cos of their amazing private knowledge about math or astronomy without having telescopes. They were giving certain knowledge but the gods were not good-doers coming with good will. The reason for giving them specific knowledge was to tease them and deceive them regarding the pleasure the hyperdimensional entities have -until now- in the use of blood, specially teenagers and virgins.
|
|
#266
05-17-2004, 10:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Q: accusations have to be proved. If I say Hawkins made an idiotic commentary (which is not the same as saying he's an idiot), I backed up what I said using the same math probabilities and his opposition regarding Thorne's hypothesis to stablish his own particular taste. So, it doesn't surprise me that you say you hate the scientists or specialists and consider everything they write is 100 inaccurate. If I say the same regarding any scientists I would be an idiot. ...like you are.
Painted Wolf:I don't base my views on films, if you can't understand the difference between an EXAMPLE of what I'm trying to post...you're mistake. Yet, you got a good point in saying Mayas gods demanded blood. I tell you the reason: Mayas never knew what they knew cos of their amazing private knowledge about math or astronomy without having telescopes. They were giving certain knowledge but the gods were not good-doers coming with good will. The reason for giving them specific knowledge was to tease them and deceive them regarding the pleasure the hyperdimensional entities have -until now- in the use of blood, specially teenagers and virgins.
|
|
#267
05-17-2004, 11:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
But I bet that's another issue to discuss somewhere else.
|
|
#268
05-17-2004, 11:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
But I bet that's another issue to discuss somewhere else.
|
|
#269
05-17-2004, 11:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In relation to Clarke's point of view:
www.testermanscifi.org/ClarkeQuotesPart4.html I know very old Mr. (os is it an "it"?) Q probably thinks he is another idiot. For the readers: www.testermanscifi.org/ClarkQuotesPart7.html You'll see he doesn't deny possibilities but he prefers to believe the aliens should be "benevolents". In that sense he is wrong. One thing is having the technology or the power and other thing is morality. His assumption in that sense is as good or bad as anyone else. He's right many UFO sightings are indeed hoaxes. But then again when someone ignores some of these sightings were made by astronauts or experienced pilots and several details known by many people, Clarke chooses to believe UFOs don't need to "park" here. This is because as many science fiction writers he focuses OUTSIDE and in humanoid entities or monsters dwelling in planets. When I talk about "gods" I'm refering to hyperdimensional trapped creatures but I already explained that.
|
|
#270
05-17-2004, 11:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In relation to Clarke's point of view:
www.testermanscifi.org/ClarkeQuotesPart4.html I know very old Mr. (os is it an "it"?) Q probably thinks he is another idiot. For the readers: www.testermanscifi.org/ClarkQuotesPart7.html You'll see he doesn't deny possibilities but he prefers to believe the aliens should be "benevolents". In that sense he is wrong. One thing is having the technology or the power and other thing is morality. His assumption in that sense is as good or bad as anyone else. He's right many UFO sightings are indeed hoaxes. But then again when someone ignores some of these sightings were made by astronauts or experienced pilots and several details known by many people, Clarke chooses to believe UFOs don't need to "park" here. This is because as many science fiction writers he focuses OUTSIDE and in humanoid entities or monsters dwelling in planets. When I talk about "gods" I'm refering to hyperdimensional trapped creatures but I already explained that.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
