![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#231
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL, you'd think aliens would be a little more artistic. That THING is TERRIBLY ASYMETRICAL!!! *cries* (I'm a perfectionist, can you tell?)
__________________
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face -forever.-GEORGE ORWELL |
|
#232
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL, you'd think aliens would be a little more artistic. That THING is TERRIBLY ASYMETRICAL!!! *cries* (I'm a perfectionist, can you tell?)
__________________
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face -forever.-GEORGE ORWELL |
|
#233
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I can show many similar things on Earth but I suppose these couple of experts wouldn't tell the difference between something natural and something artificial, or how to check that with scientific procedures, like MOLA, infrared or thermographic cameras or elevating the image to 3D, etc, etc. When Q or Painted Wolf say something, well is one thing, but if geologist (besides Hoagland winner of medal of Excellence on Science who predicted with a decade anticipation the images would show exactly what they showed) find dozens of annomalies in specific frame shown by Nasa, I let the reader decide whom to trust. And in fact, I didn't just quote Hoagland site but other scientists. You could well overlook the evidence or not, it's your business. I have the benefit of reading both Hoagland and Nasa or Pathfinder information. Hence I can and will decide, but YOU????????? ha-ha-ha-ha!
|
|
#234
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I can show many similar things on Earth but I suppose these couple of experts wouldn't tell the difference between something natural and something artificial, or how to check that with scientific procedures, like MOLA, infrared or thermographic cameras or elevating the image to 3D, etc, etc. When Q or Painted Wolf say something, well is one thing, but if geologist (besides Hoagland winner of medal of Excellence on Science who predicted with a decade anticipation the images would show exactly what they showed) find dozens of annomalies in specific frame shown by Nasa, I let the reader decide whom to trust. And in fact, I didn't just quote Hoagland site but other scientists. You could well overlook the evidence or not, it's your business. I have the benefit of reading both Hoagland and Nasa or Pathfinder information. Hence I can and will decide, but YOU????????? ha-ha-ha-ha!
|
|
#235
|
||||
|
||||
|
yes... its true some 'experts' cant tell the difference between natural and artificial objects... like Hoagland... its a good thing that real scientists used more than sketchy 70's photos to make thier cases... and then cry foul when better pictures turn up...
wich still doesn't explain if it were true why would NASA cover it up?... it could make them millions.. wa:-do |
|
#236
|
||||
|
||||
|
yes... its true some 'experts' cant tell the difference between natural and artificial objects... like Hoagland... its a good thing that real scientists used more than sketchy 70's photos to make thier cases... and then cry foul when better pictures turn up...
wich still doesn't explain if it were true why would NASA cover it up?... it could make them millions.. wa:-do |
|
#237
|
|||
|
|||
|
You see what happens when evolutionists keep on masturbating with homind tools? Semen affects completely their empty brains and they are uncapable to "see" artifacts as they could clearly see on Earth???
www.enterprisemission.com/spirit2.htm No need to read Hoagland, just look at the "stones". HA-HA-HA! These are real photographs, even Nasa admits it but doesn't reveal to the public worldwide by CNN as they did with the "eroded" mountain all at the same time all over the world since they have the devices (how oportunistic from a government agency, right???). Now, if a moron Q'rius or Painted Wolfy say something is as irrelevant if I say it. But if someone like Dr. Gil Leven, CHIEF PROJECT SCIENTIST ON THE VIKING LABELED RELEASE EXPERIENCE admits the "bullet-proof evidence about life on Mars was denied for long time" NOW, THAT IS SOMETHING TO BE CONCERNED! Dr. Tom Van Flandern believes the same: http://www.metaresearch.org/home/Vie...news010313.asp http://www.enterprisemission.com/art...d_cover-up.htm Please, continue with your posts. I really LOVE IT. Keep 'em coming.... |
|
#238
|
|||
|
|||
|
You see what happens when evolutionists keep on masturbating with homind tools? Semen affects completely their empty brains and they are uncapable to "see" artifacts as they could clearly see on Earth???
www.enterprisemission.com/spirit2.htm No need to read Hoagland, just look at the "stones". HA-HA-HA! These are real photographs, even Nasa admits it but doesn't reveal to the public worldwide by CNN as they did with the "eroded" mountain all at the same time all over the world since they have the devices (how oportunistic from a government agency, right???). Now, if a moron Q'rius or Painted Wolfy say something is as irrelevant if I say it. But if someone like Dr. Gil Leven, CHIEF PROJECT SCIENTIST ON THE VIKING LABELED RELEASE EXPERIENCE admits the "bullet-proof evidence about life on Mars was denied for long time" NOW, THAT IS SOMETHING TO BE CONCERNED! Dr. Tom Van Flandern believes the same: http://www.metaresearch.org/home/Vie...news010313.asp http://www.enterprisemission.com/art...d_cover-up.htm Please, continue with your posts. I really LOVE IT. Keep 'em coming.... |
|
#239
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hoagland IS a scientist and since the photographs come from Nasa they indeed check them up and he's not the only one and in fact they have many photographs available. So, there's no point in writing he is an "expert" between inverted commas trying to diminush him. The only incompetent and ignorant here is you. Hoagland is the one who together with Sagan gave the idea to sent Pioneer 10 and was the one who predicted the existence of water in Jupiter's moon and other things with decades of anticipation. You know nothing.
The question of why Nasa doesn't reveal the issue is ANOTHER ISSUE, moron! Open another thread and perhaps someone will be interested in wasting additional tme to take you out of ignorance misery. |
|
#240
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hoagland IS a scientist and since the photographs come from Nasa they indeed check them up and he's not the only one and in fact they have many photographs available. So, there's no point in writing he is an "expert" between inverted commas trying to diminush him. The only incompetent and ignorant here is you. Hoagland is the one who together with Sagan gave the idea to sent Pioneer 10 and was the one who predicted the existence of water in Jupiter's moon and other things with decades of anticipation. You know nothing.
The question of why Nasa doesn't reveal the issue is ANOTHER ISSUE, moron! Open another thread and perhaps someone will be interested in wasting additional tme to take you out of ignorance misery. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |