Creation vs. Evolution (Earth, Eden, genesis, eternal, bible)

[inca]

<<the pic on the top right is an admitted forgery... done by the same people who did the effect for the BBC's 'walking with dinosaurs'>>
No, it's not a forgery. Forgery was the so-called "research" made by BBC (they were tone ones who did a forgery before):
http://www.bahnhof.se/~wizard/GUSTen..._BBC_hoax.html
http://www.bahnhof.se/%7Ewizard/GUST..._BBC_hoax.html

[inca]

<<the pic on the top right is an admitted forgery... done by the same people who did the effect for the BBC's 'walking with dinosaurs'>>
No, it's not a forgery. Forgery was the so-called "research" made by BBC (they were tone ones who did a forgery before):
http://www.bahnhof.se/~wizard/GUSTen..._BBC_hoax.html
http://www.bahnhof.se/%7Ewizard/GUST..._BBC_hoax.html

[Runt]

***MOD POST***

Inca, will you please try to keep all your comments to one post, or at least wait until you get a response before posting new comments? If you think of something new that you want to add later, you can always just edit your post.

[Runt]

***MOD POST***

Inca, will you please try to keep all your comments to one post, or at least wait until you get a response before posting new comments? If you think of something new that you want to add later, you can always just edit your post.

[inca]

I'm sorry I can't. It's too much information I have always hateD to post superficial things. If I were to do what you ask the post would be so extensive that nobody would want it to read. The eyes get exhausted after a time, reading on a screen of a desktop is not the same as reading a book. What's the problem of posting that way? Why does it bother so much anyways? It's even better cos the reader needs TIME to absorb and digest information.
Painted Wolf: the photo presented in the site was something like Plesiosaurus, it was not a Bottlenose whale or Hyperoodon ampullatus. See view large photo in:
www.fotosearch.com/COR373/314005
The fishermen know pretty better than you the difference between a whale and THAT...

[inca]

I'm sorry I can't. It's too much information I have always hateD to post superficial things. If I were to do what you ask the post would be so extensive that nobody would want it to read. The eyes get exhausted after a time, reading on a screen of a desktop is not the same as reading a book. What's the problem of posting that way? Why does it bother so much anyways? It's even better cos the reader needs TIME to absorb and digest information.
Painted Wolf: the photo presented in the site was something like Plesiosaurus, it was not a Bottlenose whale or Hyperoodon ampullatus. See view large photo in:
www.fotosearch.com/COR373/314005
The fishermen know pretty better than you the difference between a whale and THAT...

[Runt]

If people are unwilling to read one long post, they will also probably be unwilling to read several short posts that all together make one long post. The length of your writing is the same whether you divide it into paragraphs in one post or several short paragraphs in multiple posts. Either way you're writing a lot that people may or may not be willing to read, but at least with it all in one post it doesn't look like you're completely dominating the forum.

[Runt]

If people are unwilling to read one long post, they will also probably be unwilling to read several short posts that all together make one long post. The length of your writing is the same whether you divide it into paragraphs in one post or several short paragraphs in multiple posts. Either way you're writing a lot that people may or may not be willing to read, but at least with it all in one post it doesn't look like you're completely dominating the forum.

[inca]

I understand your point and in the future I will try to do as you solicit but I think you're not understanding mine. It's not a matter of lenght, it's a thing about how much can the "eye" can assimilate in a single event and how much can the brain digest.The paragraph allow the reader to "breathe" for a while and re-check again. But I won't discuss this issue, it will be really off topic. There's a reason for the people to "jump" information by the net and it's completeky different from what the eyes do when reading the book. Jewish Isaac Asimov knew it quite well. And there's another reason for my style of posting which I'll rather don't explain in detail but it's pedagogical. In fact I asked a rethorical question when I said why you care. I suppose the reasons of your request....

[inca]

I understand your point and in the future I will try to do as you solicit but I think you're not understanding mine. It's not a matter of lenght, it's a thing about how much can the "eye" can assimilate in a single event and how much can the brain digest.The paragraph allow the reader to "breathe" for a while and re-check again. But I won't discuss this issue, it will be really off topic. There's a reason for the people to "jump" information by the net and it's completeky different from what the eyes do when reading the book. Jewish Isaac Asimov knew it quite well. And there's another reason for my style of posting which I'll rather don't explain in detail but it's pedagogical. In fact I asked a rethorical question when I said why you care. I suppose the reasons of your request....