Creation vs. Evolution (Earth, Eden, genesis, eternal, bible)

[Mr Spinkles]

wow, painted wolf you really know your stuff.

[Mr Spinkles]

wow, painted wolf you really know your stuff.

[inca]

The sites already explained WHY giganthosauros is not an ape and we see photographic evidence of bones. What you're saying about twisting snakes is just an interpretating according to your own liking. I have to say even in history your knowledge about the symbols on those times is pathetic! Your argument about pterodactils is really funny. Some people are saying now even the T-REX "babies" had feathers. There are different species and not all of them have to have the same characteristics just because you wanna believe in the illustrations of your choice...which are also interpretation as I said.
Regarding the pre-historical daman I have said they had changes. All the fossils about eohippus are just interpretations saying horses evolved from them. If you were someone believing in re-encarnation I won't show the bone of a real animal existing in the past or an egg and say "that's the "evidence" YOU WERE LIKE THIS in the past!!" Try to use the same silly argument at the university.
The bones and the photographic evidence indicates the giant bones were not of apes but human beings.
The word "dinosaur", Dear Friend, is a modern concept , so if you wanna make a case about the name lizards, reptils, etc, lemme remind you we're talking even originally about the frighting aspect of the creature. The word hypopothamus is an example cos is taken from Greek meaning "horse", yet it doesn't look like a horse yet they had to give that name cos there was nothing like this. The same can be said about the sea-horse.

[inca]

The sites already explained WHY giganthosauros is not an ape and we see photographic evidence of bones. What you're saying about twisting snakes is just an interpretating according to your own liking. I have to say even in history your knowledge about the symbols on those times is pathetic! Your argument about pterodactils is really funny. Some people are saying now even the T-REX "babies" had feathers. There are different species and not all of them have to have the same characteristics just because you wanna believe in the illustrations of your choice...which are also interpretation as I said.
Regarding the pre-historical daman I have said they had changes. All the fossils about eohippus are just interpretations saying horses evolved from them. If you were someone believing in re-encarnation I won't show the bone of a real animal existing in the past or an egg and say "that's the "evidence" YOU WERE LIKE THIS in the past!!" Try to use the same silly argument at the university.
The bones and the photographic evidence indicates the giant bones were not of apes but human beings.
The word "dinosaur", Dear Friend, is a modern concept , so if you wanna make a case about the name lizards, reptils, etc, lemme remind you we're talking even originally about the frighting aspect of the creature. The word hypopothamus is an example cos is taken from Greek meaning "horse", yet it doesn't look like a horse yet they had to give that name cos there was nothing like this. The same can be said about the sea-horse.

[inca]

Wow, Mr. Spinkles! You really don't know the stuff and Painted Wolf either! I said you were gonna jump information rather THAN READING and you did it exactly as I predicted! You didn't read nor understood what I posted and not even the links you post about gigantopithecus, etc. The sites are repeating the same information of how scientists chosed arbitarly largest apes to make the MODEL accoding to their own image. Of course they had to add hair to give the appearance of an ape AS USUAL. You can go to a beauty saloon and probably find the photograph of a modern man with the features of an ape hanging on the wall. Probably you didn't check the sites are filled with expressions like: probably, assumptions, would be wiser to consider the dimensions with caution and so on. They are doing the same thing National Geographic does and BBC, and I already said it. There's no way to know the amount of hair. This is all fairy tale story for naïve people like you. Read and read and read again not only my links but the very ones you're posting. Check the photographs of giant snakes, fishes and other beasts found even in our time. All your efforts to diminush the astronomic amount of information checking possible flaws don't eliminate the facts.
I have already mentioned many but many arguments of my own before and even quoted people who are scientists and are not creationists, I started talking about mutation but now you wanna make a superficial chit chat changing the thing talking and leading the issue towards me? DO YOU WANNA DISAGREE ABOUT MUTATIONS WITH NOBEL PRIZE WINNER? Who the heck you think you are? I have mentioned several books and references of scientists who are not creatonists. It doesn't mean that Creationists are accurate in some points. There's some truth everywhere, even in some words that you say. Nobody is 100% stupid to make contra-arguments and say everything he says is absolutely wrong. To say that is to be very narrow minded L7 person.

[inca]

Wow, Mr. Spinkles! You really don't know the stuff and Painted Wolf either! I said you were gonna jump information rather THAN READING and you did it exactly as I predicted! You didn't read nor understood what I posted and not even the links you post about gigantopithecus, etc. The sites are repeating the same information of how scientists chosed arbitarly largest apes to make the MODEL accoding to their own image. Of course they had to add hair to give the appearance of an ape AS USUAL. You can go to a beauty saloon and probably find the photograph of a modern man with the features of an ape hanging on the wall. Probably you didn't check the sites are filled with expressions like: probably, assumptions, would be wiser to consider the dimensions with caution and so on. They are doing the same thing National Geographic does and BBC, and I already said it. There's no way to know the amount of hair. This is all fairy tale story for naïve people like you. Read and read and read again not only my links but the very ones you're posting. Check the photographs of giant snakes, fishes and other beasts found even in our time. All your efforts to diminush the astronomic amount of information checking possible flaws don't eliminate the facts.
I have already mentioned many but many arguments of my own before and even quoted people who are scientists and are not creationists, I started talking about mutation but now you wanna make a superficial chit chat changing the thing talking and leading the issue towards me? DO YOU WANNA DISAGREE ABOUT MUTATIONS WITH NOBEL PRIZE WINNER? Who the heck you think you are? I have mentioned several books and references of scientists who are not creatonists. It doesn't mean that Creationists are accurate in some points. There's some truth everywhere, even in some words that you say. Nobody is 100% stupid to make contra-arguments and say everything he says is absolutely wrong. To say that is to be very narrow minded L7 person.

[inca]

You're the typical reader who doesn't even read what you post and no thinking either. One of the sites says "there was no way to investigate Giganto's diet"... all this is subjective. If you pick the teeth of a gorilla (increidible size) you wouldn't think the beast is vegetarian. It continues the use of uniformitarian dogma that the events of the presence shall be the key to understand the past. In every possible issue about hominids you're gonna read the same CRAP repeated to infinite "the arrival of man or whatever made it difficult the survival of them". Yet baboons, chimps, orangutangos and all apes who were less "evolved" managed tu survive man and even continue to be with us!
The so-called Replica is ridiculous. As usual as they did with the FIASCO or scientific XOAXES I mentioned by name, they INVENT A WHOLE SKULL based upon very fragmented pieces of bones. The most part of the skull (shown in white) is purely speculative. I draw myself and I can do -exactly like the arttists hired by National Geographic- a completely different skull...yet more "human". Something more?
Don't worry about Mr. Spinkles, he was taught by Catholic Church and since that church was always light years off course from science and real Bible understanding giving so much attention to Latin than Hebrew (in fact Jewish were cast out from Spain during Catholic kingdom), they have always been speculating in ignorance. America developed much more than South America and Central America because Protestans settled rather than ignorant Spaniards. So, is inevitable that Mr. Spinkles undertook and inherited part of that poorly sophisticated legacy. I don't know how old is he, but let's suppose he's 70. In that case it 's even worst cos the education 5 decades ago was even in Latin. This affects even today. An example is Mel Gibson. I had to write to his official PASSION's site and corrected an expression used in the film that was just an adaptation of the Greek word (ego eimí) to Aramaic (in Hebrew the expression would be "ani hu") and I understood what the film was saying and had to correct them. So, even if Mr. Spinkles is not old, his understanding must follow the same patterns....

[inca]

You're the typical reader who doesn't even read what you post and no thinking either. One of the sites says "there was no way to investigate Giganto's diet"... all this is subjective. If you pick the teeth of a gorilla (increidible size) you wouldn't think the beast is vegetarian. It continues the use of uniformitarian dogma that the events of the presence shall be the key to understand the past. In every possible issue about hominids you're gonna read the same CRAP repeated to infinite "the arrival of man or whatever made it difficult the survival of them". Yet baboons, chimps, orangutangos and all apes who were less "evolved" managed tu survive man and even continue to be with us!
The so-called Replica is ridiculous. As usual as they did with the FIASCO or scientific XOAXES I mentioned by name, they INVENT A WHOLE SKULL based upon very fragmented pieces of bones. The most part of the skull (shown in white) is purely speculative. I draw myself and I can do -exactly like the arttists hired by National Geographic- a completely different skull...yet more "human". Something more?
Don't worry about Mr. Spinkles, he was taught by Catholic Church and since that church was always light years off course from science and real Bible understanding giving so much attention to Latin than Hebrew (in fact Jewish were cast out from Spain during Catholic kingdom), they have always been speculating in ignorance. America developed much more than South America and Central America because Protestans settled rather than ignorant Spaniards. So, is inevitable that Mr. Spinkles undertook and inherited part of that poorly sophisticated legacy. I don't know how old is he, but let's suppose he's 70. In that case it 's even worst cos the education 5 decades ago was even in Latin. This affects even today. An example is Mel Gibson. I had to write to his official PASSION's site and corrected an expression used in the film that was just an adaptation of the Greek word (ego eimí) to Aramaic (in Hebrew the expression would be "ani hu") and I understood what the film was saying and had to correct them. So, even if Mr. Spinkles is not old, his understanding must follow the same patterns....

[inca]

In fact your links are just saying an un-detailed information which is the same info you critized in the "Creationist" site. Of course, your site didn't repeat some interesting details or didn't show the photograph of the giant femur of a human being (not an ape) found in Turkey and wouldn't mention the 37 lb copper axe of the Meganthropus.
www.s8int.com/giants1.html
www.s8int.com/giants2.html
No mentioning in your sites about
HISTORICAL skulls in Peru (some of them I saw it myself in the museums) which are not artificially deformed, or footprints in Patagonia, etc. Please, keep on writing. The more you do it, the more you fail...

[inca]

In fact your links are just saying an un-detailed information which is the same info you critized in the "Creationist" site. Of course, your site didn't repeat some interesting details or didn't show the photograph of the giant femur of a human being (not an ape) found in Turkey and wouldn't mention the 37 lb copper axe of the Meganthropus.
www.s8int.com/giants1.html
www.s8int.com/giants2.html
No mentioning in your sites about
HISTORICAL skulls in Peru (some of them I saw it myself in the museums) which are not artificially deformed, or footprints in Patagonia, etc. Please, keep on writing. The more you do it, the more you fail...