|
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#131
05-08-2004, 01:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Good to know. Something else to add in scientific approach? No? It figures!
|
|
#132
05-08-2004, 01:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good to know. Something else to add in scientific approach? No? It figures!
|
|
#133
05-08-2004, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
But I will have some fresh new to give:
Hummingbirds who didn't change in 30 million years of pseudo-evolution and "striking resemblance" after that alleguedly constant "change" . They guess the SIZE was cdue to climate changes. I SAY, indeed more than that, the aspect of science shall be answered not by paleonthologists but by geologists regarding the whole planet Earth: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3691169.stm Neanderthal who had the crown of their teeth formed 15 % FASTER than we do now but the interpretation required a further explanation: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3663865.stm Someone was making fun of the knowledge 1000 years ago, perhaps needs to know what was the source of an accurate map done in 16th Century with information we are learning NOW: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3683087.stm
|
|
#134
05-08-2004, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
But I will have some fresh new to give:
Hummingbirds who didn't change in 30 million years of pseudo-evolution and "striking resemblance" after that alleguedly constant "change" . They guess the SIZE was cdue to climate changes. I SAY, indeed more than that, the aspect of science shall be answered not by paleonthologists but by geologists regarding the whole planet Earth: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3691169.stm Neanderthal who had the crown of their teeth formed 15 % FASTER than we do now but the interpretation required a further explanation: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3663865.stm Someone was making fun of the knowledge 1000 years ago, perhaps needs to know what was the source of an accurate map done in 16th Century with information we are learning NOW: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3683087.stm
|
|
#135
05-08-2004, 02:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
...or a Chinese map made 1300 years ago with the same 12 divisions of the "heavens" as in other cultures, something of a knowledge based upon earlier documents "revealed" by the gods:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=517627 Interesting indeed and not off topic cos "Creation" includes "heavens and Earth". And the counting of the kings or gods with long life span as in the Bible, Sumerian and Chinese account will reveal many things that are invisible for the ones who don't know.
|
|
#136
05-08-2004, 02:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
...or a Chinese map made 1300 years ago with the same 12 divisions of the "heavens" as in other cultures, something of a knowledge based upon earlier documents "revealed" by the gods:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=517627 Interesting indeed and not off topic cos "Creation" includes "heavens and Earth". And the counting of the kings or gods with long life span as in the Bible, Sumerian and Chinese account will reveal many things that are invisible for the ones who don't know.
|
|
#137
05-08-2004, 04:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
anyway... about this website : http://www.anzwers.org/free/livedragons/evolutio.htm the pic on the top right is an admitted forgery... done by the same people who did the effect for the BBC's 'walking with dinosaurs'... the pic below that of the 'smiling sea dragon' is of a bottle nosed whale... a rather rare whale species that washes up on shore from time to time.. heres a picture of one: the unkown armor plated fish.. is in fact a Sturgeon.. best known for providing the world with caviar... Here is a picture: The idea that the komodo dragon is a dinosaur and not a veranid lizard is just silly... And I love how the pictures of the 'civil war pterodactyl' never have any fur... Its now known that they had fur on thier bodies... but it wasn't discovered untill the late 80's... as for anchient people and the twisting snake model... well have you ever seen snakes fight? they do so by twisting thier bodies around one another and wrestling for dominance... some pictures of this: http://www.brantacan.co.uk/AddersM2.jpg http://www.brantacan.co.uk/images/Contest5.jpg I find this to be the more plausibel explanation for the symbol... and for historic accounts of flying lizards and snakes... well they do exist.. in the jungles of asia the 'flying lizard' Draco... http://www.centralpets.com/pages/cri.../LZD2644.shtml and flying snakes: http://student-www.uchicago.edu/~jjs...yingsnake.html wa:-do
|
|
#138
05-08-2004, 04:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
anyway... about this website : http://www.anzwers.org/free/livedragons/evolutio.htm the pic on the top right is an admitted forgery... done by the same people who did the effect for the BBC's 'walking with dinosaurs'... the pic below that of the 'smiling sea dragon' is of a bottle nosed whale... a rather rare whale species that washes up on shore from time to time.. heres a picture of one: the unkown armor plated fish.. is in fact a Sturgeon.. best known for providing the world with caviar... Here is a picture: The idea that the komodo dragon is a dinosaur and not a veranid lizard is just silly... And I love how the pictures of the 'civil war pterodactyl' never have any fur... Its now known that they had fur on thier bodies... but it wasn't discovered untill the late 80's... as for anchient people and the twisting snake model... well have you ever seen snakes fight? they do so by twisting thier bodies around one another and wrestling for dominance... some pictures of this: http://www.brantacan.co.uk/AddersM2.jpg http://www.brantacan.co.uk/images/Contest5.jpg I find this to be the more plausibel explanation for the symbol... and for historic accounts of flying lizards and snakes... well they do exist.. in the jungles of asia the 'flying lizard' Draco... http://www.centralpets.com/pages/cri.../LZD2644.shtml and flying snakes: http://student-www.uchicago.edu/~jjs...yingsnake.html wa:-do
|
|
#139
05-08-2004, 04:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
and yes science knows about Gigantopithecus blacki a truely massive prehistoric ape found in china...
check out: http://www.meta-religion.com/Paranor...cus_blacki.htm http://www.uiowa.edu/~nathist/Site/giganto.html http://www.skullsunlimited.com/gigan...cki_skull.html and Meganthropus also a giant prehistoric ape... http://www.evolutionnyc.com/IBS/Simp...id/892385.html unfortunatly very little is known of them just some pieces of jawbone and possibaly some skull pieces... but we both dislike building animals from just little bits of bone so I'll move on... Its funny how with Eohippus your willing to believe that the dentition and the structure of the legs and hips and the feet could change so drastically to become Hyrax but it could not change just a little to become Equis... especally when we have so many transitory species between them... It would take A LOT more evolution to make Eohippus a Hyrax than an Equis... wa:-do
|
|
#140
05-08-2004, 04:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
and yes science knows about Gigantopithecus blacki a truely massive prehistoric ape found in china...
check out: http://www.meta-religion.com/Paranor...cus_blacki.htm http://www.uiowa.edu/~nathist/Site/giganto.html http://www.skullsunlimited.com/gigan...cki_skull.html and Meganthropus also a giant prehistoric ape... http://www.evolutionnyc.com/IBS/Simp...id/892385.html unfortunatly very little is known of them just some pieces of jawbone and possibaly some skull pieces... but we both dislike building animals from just little bits of bone so I'll move on... Its funny how with Eohippus your willing to believe that the dentition and the structure of the legs and hips and the feet could change so drastically to become Hyrax but it could not change just a little to become Equis... especally when we have so many transitory species between them... It would take A LOT more evolution to make Eohippus a Hyrax than an Equis... wa:-do
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
