O_O Wow.. Why does Almost Every non Catholic Use That.....
A. Peter was called by Greek Petros and not Petra Because of the Replacment of Feminine syntax (Scholars agree)
In Aramaic Peter was Called Kepha when translated Kepha Becomes Petra, Petra is the Feminine Syntax , Peter was Male O_O
(see there dilema) therefor he was called in Greek Petros
B. Aramic Cephas(Kepha) is Litterarly Translated into "ROCK" not "stone" O_O (research aramaic O_O)
C. Finally (ish) Yes, what Jesus was trying to say
Peter you are a insugnificant person a tiny stone.. oh By the way here are the keys to heaven... and later he thought peter so insignificant he said Peter who you forgive are forgiven and who you hold bound are held bound in heaven O_O where do you people get your logic >.<
In aramaic
Jesus said: attah KEFA hu we'al KEFA den ebnyeh qehali (the language Jesus would have been speaking)
Litterarly translates
you are a ROCK and on this ROCK I will BUILD my Church (Assembly)
Massive number of Presbyterian, Protestant, Calvinist, Catholic, Atheist Scholars agree (now anyway) the trasnlation from Aramaic to Greek need a Masculine Syntax hence Petro instead of Petra
Which means your gonna have to Update your argument... (there not using the Kepha thing anymore- They realized its a bad argument) Now i think there trying to say.. Peter didnt goto Rome... Oh wait He is Writing From babylon which is a "Code name" For peagen Rome.. Strike 2
lets see what new you can come up with
So.....
Oh.. and about me reading the Doctines of the Church i know the CCC its not unbiblical at all.... Question a specific Document that is unbiblical.. Ill show you otherwise
