![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
YOU K(NOW) what? That is their right and privilege. I do not need for anyone to LOVE ME or like ME or acknowledge ME. I AM LOVE, and I certainly have enough LOVE for the many who do not want to believe. I must confess that I find the whole concept of not believing in ME most intriguing. HELLO IT'S ME: An Interview With GOD Chapter: Preference Pg:49 If it doesn’t bother GOD there really is no reason why it should bother me. Not many religions can claim this about their God without penalty or judgment. Quote:
Last edited by cardero; 04-03-2007 at 03:03 PM. |
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
In your view, how are faith and beliefs different?
__________________
"Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." -- H.L. Mencken |
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Faith is personal, faith has to be practiced, beliefs cannot be owned and though they should be worked out, they do not respond well to repetitive training programs.
As long as a possibility exists, a belief is valid. Faith does not allow someone the luxury of believing in other possibilities. A person practicing faith takes their faith with them when they pass away, a belief is usually available when you arrive and will remain after you pass away. Beliefs can be reasoned with, faith cannot be reasoned with. Beliefs are free, faith is very taxing. Beliefs can either lead to Truth or Untruth, faith can often lead to disappointment or uncertainty. |
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But beliefs sometimes move into actions in the public sphere. For example, when creationists move to ban scientific texts from being taught in a public school, scientists "get upset" because it will affect the quality of education and the progress of technology...and eventually affect policymaking in a way that will be detrimental to what to them is proven fact. Carl Sagan and Richard Hawkins were moved to "campaign for their beliefs" on this basis, not because of cognitive dissonance. On the religious side, there are those who feel that if a tide of irreligion or atheism comes over a society, God will bring a collective punishment. A less theistic "collective punishment" concept is a motivation for environmentalists to be upset about those who don't "believe in" global warming caused by human use of fossil fuels. Same issue here: these people are probably pretty firm in their beliefs, but get upset with disagreements because they fear the consequences of living in a society with those who don't believe what they believe. That claimed-Unitarian Thomas Jefferson said something like, "it does not affect me in the slightest if my neighbor believes in one God, or twelve gods." While my tradition is tolerant to a fault, I've begun to see the limits of TJ's thinking here. Depending on what my neighbor's 12 gods are telling him to do out in the world, it does affect me. Even though UUs have a pretty big tent of belief and practice, in the end it does matter what we believe.
__________________
Lo, that word abideth ever; revelation is not sealed Answering now to our endeavor, truth and right are still revealed --(UU Hymn 189, S. Longfellow) |