![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Could it ever evolve from its current status as a ridiculous cult? Wouldn't it be fair to say that it is currently viewed the same way Mormons were first viewed?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Then I came back from where I'd been. My room, it looked the same - but there was nothing left between The Nameless and the name. - Leonard Cohen. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I doubt it
the emphasis seems to be on selling their knowledge to their followers. I do not recognise that as a religious activity. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
123456 Hamster! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Do you think that any children born to scientologist parents will deviate from the religion they are born into? Surely this will be a huge factor in its survival and becoming a respected religion.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
From some of the posts on this site, apparently scientology has already split (amazing, considering how young it is). If you believe their own rhetoric, it's the fastest growing religion in the world with well over ten million members. Every outside study shows these numbers are ludicrous and they have actually been losing members, however.
The fact is, they have money... and that never hurts an organization/religion. -Erin |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
They could go mainstream, but it would be difficult to keep the secrecy surrounding it the bigger it gets...
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
1) they don't recruit aggressively enough. They are very passive in accepting new members meaning the new members do much of the acceptance work 2) they require strong and ongoing knowledge of their faith for acceptance. if you become a scientologists you will study that religion activly for the rest of your life or not be veiwed as a serious member. They have alot of info to study 3) they tend to keep to themselves. while other religious communities network with the religious communities around them scientologists by far keep to themsevles as a lone group 4) they don't adverstise their beliefs. you either have to find a hijacked video on the net (yourtube is a good source) or get one who is willing to open up to you. even getting them to talk about their faith is tough..they expect recipcation immediatly 5) their are labor and monetary requirements that are more aggressive than most other organizations 6) hubbard's motives for creating the religion are suspect and while he may or may not have had honest intentions the perception of such goes both ways and likely damages their membership by detracting potential members. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Jesus did not come into this world to make bad people good. He came into this world to make dead people live - Ravi Zacharias ![]() I wasn't born again yesterday - A.S.A. Jones
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() But I don't think it's likely. I agree with Sunstone that the absurdity of their beliefs isn't necessarily a bar, but I think the absudity of their public face -- I'm thinking Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Kirstie Alley -- is a strong negative. Also the secrecy and the expense involved. I think Star Wars and Star Trek have greater potential as bases for religious movements than Scientology does. Quote:
__________________
|