![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is no single Ontological Argument for the existence of the Universe; the term is used as a general "umbrella" covering all a priori proofs of the Universe's existence. An early, simplistic form of the argument runs like this:
1) God exists (principle of existence) 2) Something must have created God, he cannot "come into existence" by "accident" [as some crazy auniversalists illogically believe] (principle of causality) 3) Whatever caused God must be a necessary being (principle of necessity) 4) Whatever caused God must be like God [big, annoying, made out of hydrogen] (principle of analogy) 5) The only being whose existence is necessary and who is big, annoying and made of hydrogen is the universe 6) Therefore, the universe must logically exist. Statements 1 through 5 cannot be logically refuted without contradiction, therefore statement 6 must logically follow. Besides, it says so in the Bible. It's all described in this book: "How not to dispense Logic (and how to confuse the heck out of people who don't know any better)" by "Unthinking Religious Pseudoscientist." Universe Bless.
__________________
123456 Hamster! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Consider this: Quote:
So if I don’t exist, and you are merely a product of my deranged imagination, then there is no way we can have a logical debate about things like the universe, or God, or blue cheese for that matter . So I am just going to go to bed. Good night.
__________________
. You just proved signature advertising works.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, I have read that quote many a time in the original book from which it comes. However, infinite number of worlds, not every one of them is inhabited, there can still be an infinite number of inhabited worlds (every second one is inhabited, for example). Why is there a ladybird on my keyboard at 2 o'clock in the morning? It looks like it was in a fight.
__________________
123456 Hamster! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |