Would you say I was wrong? (moral, reject, point of view, moral)

[royol]

This web site is proof, that words have absolutely no meaning at all, every word said, can be used just as we want, the same words can be used in a hundred ways, depending on your point of view,
It is pure jealousy on my part, that I did not know thirty years ago, what I know now, I would have started my own religion, it is like selling something, anything, if you talk about it in the right way, someone will buy it, and the more people that buy it, the more people will buy it, and after a while, it sells itself.
But I don't think I could have lived with the deceit thirty years ago, I could now, easily, because the pleasure it gives people would make me feel good about myself, because I know now, that even if people are living a lie, they are happy.

[Æsahættr]

Originally Posted by royol

This web site is proof, that words have absolutely no meaning at all, every word said, can be used just as we want, the same words can be used in a hundred ways, depending on your point of view

The day I don't believe that you are wrong about this will be the day I kill myself.

[egroen]

L Ron Hubbard? Is that you?

-Erin

[Comet]

[quote=royol]

This web site is proof, that words have absolutely no meaning at all, every word said, can be used just as we want, the same words can be used in a hundred ways, depending on your point of view,

Perception is relative.

Babboons are all evil and they want to rid the world of bananas. (some people probably believe that to be true, other that I am a madman for saying so - what ever knocks em out)

It is pure jealousy on my part, that I did not know thirty years ago, what I know now, I would have started my own religion, it is like selling something, anything, if you talk about it in the right way, someone will buy it, and the more people that buy it, the more people will buy it, and after a while, it sells itself.
But I don't think I could have lived with the deceit thirty years ago, I could now, easily, because the pleasure it gives people would make me feel good about myself, because I know now, that even if people are living a lie, they are happy

Nothing stopping you if you have strong enough words for people to listen to. Have at it and good luck. Words with no actions behind them are weak

[Rejected]

Originally Posted by royol

This web site is proof, that words have absolutely no meaning at all, every word said, can be used just as we want, the same words can be used in a hundred ways, depending on your point of view,
It is pure jealousy on my part, that I did not know thirty years ago, what I know now, I would have started my own religion, it is like selling something, anything, if you talk about it in the right way, someone will buy it, and the more people that buy it, the more people will buy it, and after a while, it sells itself.
But I don't think I could have lived with the deceit thirty years ago, I could now, easily, because the pleasure it gives people would make me feel good about myself, because I know now, that even if people are living a lie, they are happy.

You have taken run-on sentences and excessive comma usage to a whole new level with this one. Congratulations.

[michel]

Originally Posted by royol

This web site is proof, that words have absolutely no meaning at all, every word said, can be used just as we want, the same words can be used in a hundred ways, depending on your point of view,
It is pure jealousy on my part, that I did not know thirty years ago, what I know now, I would have started my own religion, it is like selling something, anything, if you talk about it in the right way, someone will buy it, and the more people that buy it, the more people will buy it, and after a while, it sells itself.
But I don't think I could have lived with the deceit thirty years ago, I could now, easily, because the pleasure it gives people would make me feel good about myself, because I know now, that even if people are living a lie, they are happy.

Wow! You stick to your morality, and I will to mine.

I don't think that the idea is to do what you consider others have donme that is wrong; two wrongs don't make a right.............

[Comet]

Originally Posted by Rejected

You have taken run-on sentences and excessive comma usage to a whole new level with this one. Congratulations.

You obviously have no concept of the English language, and how it works Rejected, for you just make accusations with words that, could mean anything at all and have no grounds, for making them since this post is, afterall, discussing as to whether or not somebody, that being Royal, is wrong for thinking this website, RF, is nothing but meaningless because of meaningless words, and maybe puncuation, because people will just reuse words to mean other things, like I could say look a bee and somebody might think I meant b the letter and not the insect, and then everything takes on a whole new meaning, and becomes meaningless to the purpose for which I was trying to use it, in the first place, so just feel good and happy with your lies while I sulk over not starting my own religion, say about 30 years ago! GOSH!

[egroen]

I take it back, it looks like John Updike is being channeled afterall!

[royol]

I think it's called 'burying your head in the sand'.
If you focus on something else, the message is lost.

[Bishka]

Originally Posted by royol

I think it's called 'burying your head in the sand'.
If you focus on something else, the message is lost.

Not when you can't understand the message becuase of grammatical, spelling and runon sentences.