Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Resources / Religious Books and Scriptures
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-23-2006, 09:21 PM
angellous_evangellous's Avatar
angellous_evangellous Offline
Religion: Christian
Title:pater familias
Prolific Poster Award:  - Issue reason: 10,000 posts Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to your peers and is well deserved. Humor Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved. Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D/FW, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,097
Frubals: 3462377
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Booko
For comparison, I find the many exhortations in the Qu'ran to be much clearer: "Believe in God and the Last Day."

Who knows, maybe God had the idea that people would eventually question the worth of Revelation, and had Muhammad give a warning about the subject as well.
Revelation is not the only book in the NT that refers to the last day, end of times, or the apocalypse. We'd be doing just fine without a book that no one has ever understood, except possibly the original audience...
__________________
From each according to his interest rate, to each according to his credit.

-Capitalist Manifesto-
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:24 AM
may Offline
Religion: JW
Title:TEMP BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 3,664
Frubals: 25688
may has much to be proud of
may has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud ofmay has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Booko
Sheesh, and I forgot to reply directly to the OP!

As for the book:

In Daniel, he is told to seal up the book until the time of the end. This may or may not apply to Revelation, but since they both appear to deal with prophecy concerning the "end time" -- it's no wonder Revelation has historically been so opaque. I wouldn't expect it to make any sense if it is "sealed up" also, and when the time comes, it would probably only be clear to those who manage to see with a spiritual eye (and even then maybe not *very* clear...but just sorta less opaque!)

As for the verse itself, it could be ambiguous. It's kinda hard to "take to heart" something that is so...encoded. And what sort of "near" did the author have in mind? That's been quite a subject of debate. Although, given the numeric references in Revelation that compute to 1260, I have a hard time understanding how 1260 years could be considered exactly imminent. Oh well, that's fodder for another thread probably.

For comparison, I find the many exhortations in the Qu'ran to be much clearer: "Believe in God and the Last Day."

Who knows, maybe God had the idea that people would eventually question the worth of Revelation, and had Muhammad give a warning about the subject as well.
yes it was sealed up untill the last days, but not any more . it certainly is being revealed to those who have insight.
"As regards those having insight among the people, they will impart understanding to the many."—DANIEL 11:33.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:01 PM
Linus's Avatar
Linus Offline
Religion: Christian
Title:Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kentucky
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,226
Frubals: 12641
Linus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to allLinus is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by angellous_evangellous
IMO, the book as a whole should not be in the canon.
Why do you believe that, exactly?
__________________
How many of you believe in telekinesis? Raise my hand...
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:04 PM
angellous_evangellous's Avatar
angellous_evangellous Offline
Religion: Christian
Title:pater familias
Prolific Poster Award:  - Issue reason: 10,000 posts Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to your peers and is well deserved. Humor Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved. Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D/FW, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,097
Frubals: 3462377
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linus
Why do you believe that, exactly?
Historically its inclusion in the canon was questioned at the time of canonization, and as I mentioned before, the church has never understood it.

Why keep something that is hopelessly impossible to interpret?

Besides, the fundies love it so much, and I don't like them, so I'd love to see it go just to make them mad.
__________________
From each according to his interest rate, to each according to his credit.

-Capitalist Manifesto-
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:08 PM
nutshell's Avatar
nutshell Offline
Religion: Non-literal LDS
Title:BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 7,097
Frubals: 681113
nutshell thinks frubals grow on trees
nutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on trees
nutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on trees
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by angellous_evangellous
Historically its inclusion in the canon was questioned at the time of canonization, and as I mentioned before, the church has never understood it.

Why keep something that is hopelessly impossible to interpret?

Besides, the fundies love it so much, and I don't like them, so I'd love to see it go just to make them mad.
It's understood by those who have the insight. It was written in a way that those who were ready to understand and be held accountable could understand it and those who were not ready would not understand it.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:10 PM
angellous_evangellous's Avatar
angellous_evangellous Offline
Religion: Christian
Title:pater familias
Prolific Poster Award:  - Issue reason: 10,000 posts Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to your peers and is well deserved. Humor Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved. Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D/FW, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,097
Frubals: 3462377
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nutshell
It's understood by those who have the insight. It was written in a way that those who were ready to understand and be held accountable could understand it and those who were not ready would not understand it.
I can both insist that I have insight and that my interpretation is correct. However, that would be dishonest. I don't think that there is a person alive who can claim that they understand that book. There are no authoritative interpretations that I know of...

I agree that it is possible that the first readers understood it, but no one else.

EDIT: It appears then, that the only way to "understand" Revelation is to do so dogmatically. You have to dogmatically be affirmed that you "understand" Revelation the way that other spiritually enlightened folk have "understood it" once these folk certify that you have whatever it takes to be "ready".

That's not an interpretative method, and not evidence that anyone has ever understood it or understands it today.
__________________
From each according to his interest rate, to each according to his credit.

-Capitalist Manifesto-

Last edited by angellous_evangellous; 07-24-2006 at 01:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:16 PM
kateyes's Avatar
kateyes Offline
Religion: kinda Christian
Title:Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: michigan
Gender: Female
Posts: 540
Frubals: 41032
kateyes has much to be proud of
kateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud ofkateyes has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nutshell
It's understood by those who have the insight. It was written in a way that those who were ready to understand and be held accountable could understand it and those who were not ready would not understand it.

I know of very few people who can honestly say they understand Revelations--my initial reaction when I read it the first time was to wonder what kind of magic mushrooms this guy was eatting. I have read it since several times--I think it was written with the idea that the 2nd coming was imminent--indeed I have been told several of the prophecies probably apply to events that happened in the 1st millenium and have no revelevance to today at all. I never quite understood why it was included in the canon.
__________________
"The important thing is not to stop questioning."--Albert Einstein

When I do good, I feel good. When I do bad, I feel bad. And that is my religion."
– Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:30 PM
nutshell's Avatar
nutshell Offline
Religion: Non-literal LDS
Title:BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 7,097
Frubals: 681113
nutshell thinks frubals grow on trees
nutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on trees
nutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on trees
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by angellous_evangellous
I can both insist that I have insight and that my interpretation is correct. However, that would be dishonest. I don't think that there is a person alive who can claim that they understand that book. There are no authoritative interpretations that I know of...

I agree that it is possible that the first readers understood it, but no one else.

EDIT: It appears then, that the only way to "understand" Revelation is to do so dogmatically. You have to dogmatically be affirmed that you "understand" Revelation the way that other spiritually enlightened folk have "understood it" once these folk certify that you have whatever it takes to be "ready".

That's not an interpretative method, and not evidence that anyone has ever understood it or understands it today.
You simply choose not to recognize the authority it has been interpreted by.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:32 PM
angellous_evangellous's Avatar
angellous_evangellous Offline
Religion: Christian
Title:pater familias
Prolific Poster Award:  - Issue reason: 10,000 posts Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to your peers and is well deserved. Humor Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved. Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D/FW, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,097
Frubals: 3462377
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nutshell
You simply choose not to recognize the authority it has been interpreted by.
That's because there is no method.

Why should I accept someone else's dogmatic insistance on the meaning of a text when I can do that myself?
__________________
From each according to his interest rate, to each according to his credit.

-Capitalist Manifesto-
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:32 PM
nutshell's Avatar
nutshell Offline
Religion: Non-literal LDS
Title:BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 7,097
Frubals: 681113
nutshell thinks frubals grow on trees
nutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on trees
nutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on treesnutshell thinks frubals grow on trees