![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Not only does it lose it's punch when an explanation is necessary but it shows I blew the chance for a great "zinger" (at least it was great in my mind when I wrote it). Ah, the agony of defeat by honest critics! But hopefully I conveyed the thought that this was but another "catchy" phrase, a la Madison Ave, much like the scoffing "Adam and Steve". Bob |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think this needs to be approached more carefully this time. Removal of "under God" must reflect how the pledge was meant to be a statement of political, not monotheistic, solidarity and not part of a "separation of Church/State" purge of all aspects of the US's religious heritage.
dlw
__________________
The Anti-Manicheist:A blog dedicated towards reducing the faith-based political acrimony. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |