Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Everything But the Kitchen Sink / Political Debates
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-29-2008, 07:06 PM
Neo-Logic's Avatar
Neo-Logic Offline
Religion: Burden of Proof
Title:Skeptical Economist
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: California, U.S.A.
Gender: Male
Posts: 953
Frubals: 223966
Neo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond repute
Neo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond reputeNeo-Logic has a reputation beyond repute
Default Education Requirements For Voting & 15th Amendment

There's been suggestion that educational requirements should be placed for voting. The logic behind this being that by having more educated people voting, that the decisions would be more "qualified" or "better" and that the "best" decision could then be achieved.

Section 1 of the 15th Amendment states "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."

Does the 15th Amendment implicitly prohibit educational requirements on voting? It states, voting shoudn't be hindered on account of race, and color. If we place educational requirements on voting, doesn't the fact that the different races in America have varying levels of affluence and educational competencies make this about race & color?

According to National Assessment of Adult Literacy, a performance test in the following categories of a large and diverse sample yielded whites and asians higher and blacks and hispanics always resulted in lowest scores.
  • Prose: Whites had the highest scores followed by Asians/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, and Hispanics
  • Document: Whites and Asians/Pacific Islanders had the highest scores followed by Blacks and Hispanics
  • Quantitative: Whites had the highest scores followed by Asians/Pacific Islanders, and both Blacks and Hispanics
Also the fact that hispanics and blacks constitute the majority of the lower class families would equate to a weaker foundation for educating their children.

So if we can agree that education level differs on average, with varying races, and also that affluence differs with every race - putting some in disadvantage while others in more advantegeous situations, wouldn't the educational requirements for voting be in violation of the 15th amendment quid pro quo?
__________________
For Every Animal You Don't Eat, I will Eat TWO! Starting With The Cute Ones!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Similar Threads


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11 AM.


© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.