|
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
06-20-2006, 07:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Sunstone dung rating!
After much internal turmoil tearing my heart to and fro, toying with the idea of a mind blowingly awsome rating system for our long winded expresions of ..... of..... well dung. aka poetry.
I think it would be a great idea to have a rating system for our poetry. I personally like Sunstone's rating in his comments, so I propose using it as a rating system. Any ideas? 1 - maggot dung (rubbish, give up now.) 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - KING KONG DUNG! (a work worthy of legend)
__________________
The only reason why conscious intentions fail is because they are sabotaged by subconscious counter intentions. 
|
|
#2
06-20-2006, 08:24 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think horse manure is good, fertile, acceptable poetry. Stuff no one should be be ashamed about, but could be improved upon.
Then there's giraffe crap. Better than horse manure, more fertile, more finished, bigger impact. Giraffe crap's North American equivalent might be, or might not be the fabled moose poo. And of course the esteemed, covetted and long sought after Elephant dung. Just below the stuff of legends: King Kong. Mouse poo. Not good, but not so bad the poet should surrender his or her wood processor to charity and take up some other hobby. Mouse poo is poo with at least one redeeming quality. Those are some ideas.
__________________
Then I came back from where I'd been. My room, it looked the same - but there was nothing left between The Nameless and the name. - Leonard Cohen.
|
|
#3
06-20-2006, 08:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just a suggestion Mystic, but why don't we go for a twelve point system rather than a 10 point system, for a dozen is more poetic than 10 isn't it? Also easier to work with, IMO.
__________________
Then I came back from where I'd been. My room, it looked the same - but there was nothing left between The Nameless and the name. - Leonard Cohen.
|
|
#4
06-20-2006, 08:45 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great idea! 12 it is "the dirty dozen"
So theres 1 - Magot dung 2 - 3 - Mouse poo 4 - 5 - 6 - horse manure 7 - moose poo 8 - Giraffe crap 9 - 10 - 11 - Elephant dung 12 - KING KONG DUNG
__________________
The only reason why conscious intentions fail is because they are sabotaged by subconscious counter intentions.
|
|
#5
06-20-2006, 09:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great idea! 12 it is "the dirty dozen"
So theres 1 - Magot dung 2 - Ant Dust 3 - Mouse poo 4 - Dog dung 5 - Pig's crap 6 - horse manure 7 - moose poo 8 - Giraffe crap 9 - Bear scat 10 - Hippo poo 11 - Elephant dung 12 - KING KONG DUNG
__________________
Then I came back from where I'd been. My room, it looked the same - but there was nothing left between The Nameless and the name. - Leonard Cohen.
|
|
#6
06-20-2006, 09:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Where does winnie the pooh stand in all of this ?
__________________
My life is an open book; if you don't like the read, put me back on the shelf ....................
|
|
#7
06-20-2006, 09:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh Nooooooooooooooooooo!!! I knew there would b a good one we forgot! maybe that should be a special rating? The Winnie the Poo rating of exellence. criteria still to be deceided.
__________________
The only reason why conscious intentions fail is because they are sabotaged by subconscious counter intentions.
|
|
#8
06-20-2006, 10:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, perhaps a special classification not about scale (or summink).
__________________
"Do not be afraid of falling into emptiness. Falling into emptiness is not so bad.." - Layman P'ang
|
|
#9
06-20-2006, 10:34 AM
|
||||
|
