![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I used to have a much more fulfilling social life than I do now I have to admit. Yet given the time I now have at my disposal I have begun to ask myself some interesting questions .....
People I knew in my past are still present in my life today. I have vivid recollection of interactions with important contacts from the past which would allow me IMO to "reprend" those contacts today without any cut or delay from years of physical disconnection from those persons. Obviously since those persons of whom I speak (significant to me) are no longer present as physical entities, yet are still significant to me, I arrive at this question. Are those persons still present, or are they absent? That question leads me on to ask whether they were ever physically present since my recollection of them holds the same physical presence of touch, flavour, and sensory quality as it ever did when I might have physically been beside them. Is our current interaction with others a representation inside our heads or is it something different than a representation? The same question was asked a couple of centuries ago by a famous philosopher/scientist of whose name escapes me in relation to sight (a purely automatic/hardwired perceptual phenomenon). Does the image we perceive, exist out there or in here?
__________________
"If a lion could talk, you wouldn't understand him" - Plagiarism |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
*bump*
__________________
"If a lion could talk, you wouldn't understand him" - Plagiarism |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
None of this indicates that they were not "physically present". Quote:
To both. "In here" is "out there"; there is no other place for it to be. There is only one reality, and you're "it" (as am I).
__________________
It's less of a world take over and more of a world make over. - Dr. Phineas Waldolf Steel Brad Chat |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
^ that pretty much, our perceived image of someone can be slightly different to the person but that is self manipulation, if you want someone enough you can believe theyre a good person.
The person exists out there. What is 'in here' is a perceived image of the person. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |