Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Everything But the Kitchen Sink / Philosophy
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-29-2008, 10:30 PM
Ozzie's Avatar
Ozzie Offline
Religion: Buddhist blindsight
Title:Same path not footprint.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,352
Frubals: 366029
Ozzie eats frubals for breakfast
Ozzie eats frubals for breakfast
Ozzie eats frubals for breakfastOzzie eats frubals for breakfast
Default Inhabiting heads.

I used to have a much more fulfilling social life than I do now I have to admit. Yet given the time I now have at my disposal I have begun to ask myself some interesting questions .....

People I knew in my past are still present in my life today. I have vivid recollection of interactions with important contacts from the past which would allow me IMO to "reprend" those contacts today without any cut or delay from years of physical disconnection from those persons.

Obviously since those persons of whom I speak (significant to me) are no longer present as physical entities, yet are still significant to me, I arrive at this question.

Are those persons still present, or are they absent?

That question leads me on to ask whether they were ever physically present since my recollection of them holds the same physical presence of touch, flavour, and sensory quality as it ever did when I might have physically been beside them.

Is our current interaction with others a representation inside our heads or is it something different than a representation?

The same question was asked a couple of centuries ago by a famous philosopher/scientist of whose name escapes me in relation to sight (a purely automatic/hardwired perceptual phenomenon).

Does the image we perceive, exist out there or in here?
__________________
"If a lion could talk, you wouldn't understand him" - Plagiarism
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:15 PM
Ozzie's Avatar
Ozzie Offline
Religion: Buddhist blindsight
Title:Same path not footprint.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,352
Frubals: 366029
Ozzie eats frubals for breakfast
Ozzie eats frubals for breakfast
Ozzie eats frubals for breakfastOzzie eats frubals for breakfast
Default

*bump*
__________________
"If a lion could talk, you wouldn't understand him" - Plagiarism
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:32 PM
Willamena's Avatar
Willamena Offline
Religion: Just Me
Title:Just be there, doing that
Creative Thread Award:  - Issue reason: This creative thread award is given to you by your peers and is well deserved. 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,556
Frubals: 3859236
Willamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal Whore
Willamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal Whore
Willamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal WhoreWillamena is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzie View Post
Are those persons still present, or are they absent?

That question leads me on to ask whether they were ever physically present since my recollection of them holds the same physical presence of touch, flavour, and sensory quality as it ever did when I might have physically been beside them.
They are present in memory, but (and here's the thing) so are the people in the present. The image we are given by the brain to know the world by is time-delayed from actual (or "ultimate reality"). Our entire experience of reality, however current, is drawn from memory.

None of this indicates that they were not "physically present".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzie View Post
Is our current interaction with others a representation inside our heads or is it something different than a representation?
Yes.

To both.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzie View Post
Does the image we perceive, exist out there or in here?
"In here" is "out there"; there is no other place for it to be. There is only one reality, and you're "it" (as am I).
__________________
It's less of a world take over and more of a world make over.
- Dr. Phineas Waldolf Steel

Brad Chat
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-08-2008, 03:07 PM
Hugga_Bear Offline
Religion: Atheist
Title:Anonymous0
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 4
Frubals: 10
Hugga_Bear is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

^ that pretty much, our perceived image of someone can be slightly different to the person but that is self manipulation, if you want someone enough you can believe theyre a good person.

The person exists out there. What is 'in here' is a perceived image of the person.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Similar Threads


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 AM.


© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.