![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I found some useful webpages that I would like to pass along...
Western Concepts of God [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] - It would be much better if there were actual references... Teleological Arguments for God's Existence (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) - this one looks good
__________________
"Scully, one of these days, we're going to look back on this moment and laugh." - Fox Last edited by angellous_evangellous; 10-29-2007 at 01:50 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
People would do well to read your second reference and actually try to understand it.
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
From Teleological Arguments For God's Existence: "The mind in question, being prior to nature itself, is typically taken to be supernatural."
I really like that, taken both in context and out of context! ![]()
__________________
I could still be wrong. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The only problem is that it tends to further the error that teleology connected to "God" belief is somehow ontological in scope, distracting from the fact that teleology necessarily points to the belief state of the observer and the function of the observer's own mental process in making judgments about "design." It's at that latter level that these design and "First Cause" arguments fall apart.
__________________
And thus I clothe my naked villainy
With old odd ends stolen forth from holy writ And seem a saint when most I play the devil. - Richard III If you want to catch a fish, don't follow a chicken. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
You know angelous the concept of God, Gods or a god is not a matter of philosophy but one of religion-
Scientificly- if there is a "GOD' we are not aware of "GOD" |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The question of God is and has been a philosophical question since the beginning of philosophy.
__________________
"Scully, one of these days, we're going to look back on this moment and laugh." - Fox |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Then Philosophy is a vain thing and I will have no part of it- For how can man reason about that which he is not aware of- tell me angelous
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you had read the links that I had provided, and understood them, you might have posted something more insightful.
__________________
"Scully, one of these days, we're going to look back on this moment and laugh." - Fox |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
|