![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have found the following article to be a very good explanation, and one that is far more eloquent than I could produce, of some of the soteriological differences between eastern and western Christian confessions. Many thanks to Comprehend for bringing it to my attention (he deserves frubals but I'm out).
http://www.stpaulsirvine.org/html/Justification.htm As this difference is often one of the most important reasons that converts give for choosing Orthodoxy over other churches and also given how very real a difference this makes to our theology and how often I am asked to explain aspects of it, I thought that it was worth stickying this link in the EO forum. Don't be surprised if I recommend it frequently - it really is that good. James
__________________
Doamne Iisuse Hristoase, Fiul lui Dumnezeu, miluieşte-mă pe mine, păcătosul. Last edited by JamesThePersian; 03-02-2007 at 04:28 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you so very much for bringing this article to my attention. Just in the past year I had come to the conclusion that the Augustinian model of original sin was flawed and that original sin or original guilt needed to be reexamined by the Roman Church. Recently I have also looked into soteriology and was not pleased with the compartmentalized theories like the satisfaction theory which placed to much emphasis on one aspect of justification. After reading this article I must say that I believe I am fully in line with the Eastern theology concerning these issues. I must say that this article is just plain great!
Before I had become more familiarized with Eastern theology I held the view, mostly out of ignorant arrogance, that when the East and West where reconciled it would be the East that would have to renounce their false teachings and return to communion with Rome. I have given up this view and I am ashamed that I ever held it. After reading this article on soteriology it has become all the more clear that both Churches are going to have to give and take in order to be reconciled. I believe the the Western Church should follow the lead of the Eastern Church in this matter of soteriology to include the adoption of the sacramental model of the East (infant baptism, chrism, communion, etc...) Thank you James for opening my eyes and letting some light in, May God bless you PeAcE
__________________
God does not exist...God is existence. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Runlikethewind, keep an eye on this thread:
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/showthread.php?p=776574#post776574 Hopefully it will give you further insight on our differences. ~Victor
__________________
"Man can be defined as an animal that makes dogmas. . . . " G.K. Chesterton |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |