![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 1960's were a time of war protests and sexual liberties. Hero's of the day where Dr. Martin Luther King, Jack Kennedy and Bobby Kennedy. They were champions for change back then.
As of late there are war protests and talk of same sex marriages. The modern day candidates are Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Obama looked and sounded very much like Jack Kennedy did after the Iowa caucus victory. Hillary has much support as well around the country mostly because they both stand basically for the same ideals that Dr. King and the Kennedy brothers did. If elected, could they suffer the same fate even today?
__________________
It's my right to be wrong, now frubal me!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, the secret service is much more alert toward possible assassinations.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmmmm, really? So Ronald Regan had poor security? What makes security so much better now? Just because you think everything old was second class and every thing modern is so much better now? What do you base your opinion of today's security on?
__________________
It's my right to be wrong, now frubal me!
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's a nice thought. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What do you think about security today? Is it better? Why? If there was another inside job like the Kennedy assassination, would a questionable better security really matter?
__________________
It's my right to be wrong, now frubal me!
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Bush senior wasn't much better, but he's no longer in power. And this time around, the guys who are in power don't have a lot of political support. Chaney would be the most likely loose cannon. I suspect he and his crew of zionist neo-cons are capable of anything. But I don't think he's foolish enough to try something that drastic. Besides, he and his pals have already stolen hundreds of billions of dollars and have gotten away with it. Unless he's patently insane, what more could he want to gain from playing the strings of a puppet president? |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Many people think this is just about the United States. Cheney's ambition is world wide. I would say without a doubt, he is the most powerful man in the world. As far as Daddy Bush is concerned, he is old and retired, but still has many friends in high places and can if he wants to influence more than you think.
__________________
It's my right to be wrong, now frubal me!
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Like or hate Clinton and Obama, you still have to give them credit for stepping up like they have.
__________________
My Dragon Scroll: http://dragcave.net/user/Warhart I asked the question "What Would Satan Do?" In when I pondered this question, I was able to answer on the most important decisions of my life. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I personally know of someone who said that if obama gets elected he's going to blow the "n*****'s" head out.. kinda scary stuff. And he seemed serious.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|