Teabagger voter suppression plot exposed in Wisconsin

[Revoltingest]

Originally Posted by LittlePinky82

LOL! You're mistaken. I, speaking for myself, don't tolerate racism and bigotry. I don't care if you're the Pope or the Queen of England. If you're a racist and/or a bigot I don't tolerate it. But if you lie about something what does that mean?

Mr Smoke can handle his own response, Pinkerton.

[LittlePinky82]

Originally Posted by Revoltingest

Mr Smoke can handle his own response, Pinkerton.

Remember what I said about personal attacks. Oh and you have no problem jumping in speaking for people do you? Especially us "left wingers" right? So please keep that crap to your hypocritical self.

[Revoltingest]

Originally Posted by LittlePinky82

Remember what I said about personal attacks.

Yes. Perhaps you should stop doing that.
You're welcome to file a complaint with the mods.

[LittlePinky82]

Originally Posted by Revoltingest

Yes. Perhaps you should stop doing that.

If you think I've done a personal attack report it. Other wise just shut up. You would find I've done NO personal attacks. I'm not pathetic.

[Revoltingest]

Originally Posted by LittlePinky82

If you think I've done a personal attack report it. Other wise just shut up. You would find I've done NO personal attacks. I'm not pathetic.

Good heavens....Pinky issues orders on the forum now?

[LittlePinky82]

Originally Posted by Revoltingest

Good heavens....Pinky issues orders on the forum now?

Do you have anything to add? Any substance or you just here spamming? Again like I said: if you think I've done a personal attack report it. Other wise move on. I mentioned it once when you were being a douche and now I'm done. If you want to stay on that fine, but you won't be talking to me with that. I said my part and I'm moving on. I've got better things to do and talk about.

[Smoke]

Originally Posted by Revoltingest

Geeze, man....get a grip. It's childish to call someone a liar over a mere disagreement.

Instead of addressing what Shadow Wolf said, you made a bunch of insinuations about her character. Instead of addressing what I said, you just called me childish. You specialize in misdirection by personal attack, and yes, that's dishonest. You've successfully derailed the thread, though, so I guess dishonesty is working for you.

[Reverend Rick]

Let's get back on topic OK?

The only good thing I can see about the TEA party is, it is energising a group of people, (who are anti-government) to get out and vote.

The real issue here is, what we want to do as a country and how we are going to afford to do it.

No matter who holds office in the future, we are going to have to have a smaller government. Financial restraints will take over eventually.

As far as the OP goes, there is dirt in every campaign. I've yet to see a clean election.

Bottom line, come November the party is over for Democrats. I don't understand all the ruckus. It's not like they where getting much done anyway.

[Revoltingest]

Originally Posted by Smoke

Instead of addressing what Shadow Wolf said, you made a bunch of insinuations about her character. Instead of addressing what I said, you just called me childish. You specialize in misdirection by personal attack, and yes, that's dishonest. You've successfully derailed the thread, though, so I guess dishonesty is working for you.

Yes, my post was personal towards you. That's cuz I addressed your ad hominem.
I think it was fair & appropriate to call Shadow on incorrect playing of the race card & her abuse of Tea Partiers.
You might consider that when you call someone dishonest, & that person knows otherwise, it just reflects poorly on you.
This is why we don't say everything that pops into our heads.

I think we should accept that political movements are generally sincere. We needn't look for conspiracies, sheets with
eyeholes or ulterior motives to explain them. It's more important to understand them than to insult & demonize them.

[Shadow Wolf]

I think it was fair & appropriate to call Shadow on incorrect playing of the race card & her abuse of Tea Partiers.

A new survey by the University of Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race & Sexuality offers fresh insight into the racial attitudes of Tea Party sympathizers. "The data suggests that people who are Tea Party supporters have a higher probability"—25 percent, to be exact—"of being racially resentful than those who are not Tea Party supporters," says Christopher Parker, who directed the study. "The Tea Party is not just about politics and size of government. The data suggests it may also be about race."...
When read the statement that "if blacks would only try harder, they could be just as well off as whites," 73 percent of the movement's supporters agreed, while only 33 percent of people who disapproved of the Tea Party agreed. Asked if blacks should work their way up "without special favors," as the Irish, Italians, and other groups did, 88 percent of supporters agreed, compared to 56 percent of opponents. The study revealed that Tea Party enthusiasts were also more likely to have negative opinions of Latinos and immigrants.

Are Tea Partiers Racist? - Newsweek
Abusing them? The Tea Party seems to be the one doing the abuse. Why can't you just accept the Tea Party is filled with racism? It would be different if it was only a few people, but there have been so many incidents that the only way to ignore it is to turn a blind eye to it.