Kierkegaard; faith vs. knowledge. (reject, evolution, eternity, God, Christ)

[Christopher Krajewski]

The question of sensitivity to one's faith means the relationship to how we are able to present the matter of spreadinf the faith, or feeling that faith was more or less a demand upon one's character to doing in the broadest essence GOOD.
I really feel insenstive taking up a Keirkegaardian way for determing that science was not available to love God or even help in proving His existence.
However, the regard of insenstitivity in the case of deciding to reject or accept THEM. in a manner of speaking, that God, is of great value as of Kierkegaard and why people in free concerns may and have to at times fail.
Its not a question of sensitivity, but it is deep to the sensitive issue of how in the state that person can choose his religious worth of belonging.

[Greyprophet]

That doesnt say anything much now does it. Really. Read it slow.

[Greyprophet]

Second Law of Thermodynamics...Entropy....it is proof of God.

It is contrary to evolution no matter how they try to distort Entropy into being natures way of isolating entropy flow to the highest form...of course it would....and it would still degenerate order and structure (heterogenious principles). to a lesser state of disorder.....beings...anything naturally go from a more organized state to a more disorganized state. From complex to simple.

Ah.....does it or does it not? It does.

[Greyprophet]

So many scientific facts contridict the theory of evolution it is actually mind boggling.

[Greyprophet]

Anyone wishing to debate the Law of Entropy be my guest.

Thermodynamics is very fun to discuss. Perhaps on another thread.

[Annon11]

It is unfortunate that most of our Holy Words were written thousands of years ago. It seems that each of the 14,000 know religions is the only and Devine path to Eternity. I think that religion itself is more a path to living and loving each other than a sole unique path to the Hereafter.

[lilithu]

Originally Posted by Christopher Krajewski

The question of sensitivity to one's faith means the relationship to how we are able to present the matter of spreadinf the faith, or feeling that faith was more or less a demand upon one's character to doing in the broadest essence GOOD.
I really feel insenstive taking up a Keirkegaardian way for determing that science was not available to love God or even help in proving His existence.
However, the regard of insenstitivity in the case of deciding to reject or accept THEM. in a manner of speaking, that God, is of great value as of Kierkegaard and why people in free concerns may and have to at times fail.
Its not a question of sensitivity, but it is deep to the sensitive issue of how in the state that person can choose his religious worth of belonging.

I love Kierkegaard, and I have read your post twice slowly and still have no idea what you're saying. Please restate.

[lilithu]

Originally Posted by Greyprophet

Second Law of Thermodynamics...Entropy....it is proof of God.

No, it is not.

Originally Posted by Greyprophet

It is contrary to evolution no matter how they try to distort Entropy into being natures way of isolating entropy flow to the highest form...of course it would....and it would still degenerate order and structure (heterogenious principles). to a lesser state of disorder.....beings...anything naturally go from a more organized state to a more disorganized state. From complex to simple.

Ah.....does it or does it not? It does.

Of course things still eventually degenerate. That is why we die. That is why we use up so much energy - ie, kill so many other living things and use their stored energy - to maintain this temporary stay against disorder. That is why we generate so much heat in the process.

Evolution does not violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Things can go from simple to complex in an open system, which is what we have.

Originally Posted by Greyprophet

Anyone wishing to debate the Law of Entropy be my guest.

Thermodynamics is very fun to discuss. Perhaps on another thread.

You are sadly overconfident. Go look up "open system" with respect to entropy. Study it until you understand it. And then if you still want to debate entropy and evolution, take it to another thread.