![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Bible has been used to support various agendas in political and social issues throughout history. Anything from pro slavery to the abolishment of slavery.
In Judaism various social movements or thinkers have taken the Biblical (or Talmudic/Midrashic) narratives in order to support causes within Jewish society. I can think of several examples: Presenting Lilith as a champion of women rights in Jewish feminist movements. Presenting the northern kingdom of Israel as a prototype for a modern cosmopolitan and secular society, as opposed to the stricter southern kingdom of Judah who treated the kingdom of Israel as a society which tolerated regional polytheism and even blended it with its society. Presenting the story of eating the forbidden fruit as a divine plan to initiate mankind into sexual maturity. How do you feel about breathing new points of view into the orthodox narrative in order to set in motion social changes or agendas in Jewish society? can you think of more relevant examples? Do you believe that this testifies to the non static nature and strength of Biblical narratives and Jewish literature which can prevent them from becoming obsolete, or do you believe that it's marching into sacred grounds and violating an historical status quo?
__________________
No lamb for the lazy wolf. No battle's won in bed. Last edited by Caladan; 07-05-2012 at 01:15 PM.. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Really, no takers?
__________________
No lamb for the lazy wolf. No battle's won in bed. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't care much for eisegesis and thoughtless inkblot theology.
__________________
-- gadol kvod habriot --
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Then this thread is obviously not for you. Thanks for singing in regardless.
__________________
No lamb for the lazy wolf. No battle's won in bed. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But I think even radical midrash or radical halachah needs to be done in a way that makes a sensible fit with the tradition. Trying to cast Lilith as a feminist archetype never seemed particularly tasteful or suitable to me. Nor trying to spin the Northern Kingdom's inability to embrace monotheism as "cosmopolitanism." On the other hand, I think exotericizing some Kabbalistic narratives and mainstreaming them has been useful. And re-reading incidents like the Eden story or the Akedah in ways not widely done in older times to suit more modern philosophical and theological views has sometimes produced promising material.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodies? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I answered the question asked. Sorry you took offense.
__________________
-- gadol kvod habriot --
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |