The Biggest Misconception about Islam (moral, punishment, followers, blood)

[Ahmadso]

The Biggest Misconception about Islam

This is the biggest misconception about Islam, no doubt resulting from the constant stereotyping and bashing the media gives Islam. Every time speculation arises that a bomb is responsible for a tragedy, Non-Muslims and Muslims alike suspect the Islamic connection. Of course the disclaimers abound, but a lingering suspicion about Muslims is left in the general views of terrorism, even if other groups are identified as the main culprits for any particular incident.

When a gunman attacks a mosque in the name of Judaism, a Catholic IRA guerrilla sets off a bomb in an urban area, or Serbian Orthodox militiamen rape and kill innocent Muslim civilians, these acts are not used to stereotype an entire faith. Never are these acts attributed to the religion of the perpetrators. Yet how many times have we heard the words 'Islamic, Muslim fundamentalist. etc.' linked with violence?

Images and terminology influence public opinion, and a bitter taste is left when Islam is reported in the daily headlines. The term "Islamic fundamentalism", whatever it means, has been repeated enough times in relation to violent incidents that naturally, any thinking human being has to be uncomfortable with the fact that America is home to a vibrant Muslim community. The problem stems from negative images about Islam. In the court of public opinion, Islam is guilty until proven innocent.

However, when one analyzes the situation, the question that should come to mind is: Do the teachings of Islam encourage terrorism? The answer: Certainly not! Islam totally forbids the terrorist acts that are carried out by some misguided people. It should be remembered that all religions have cults and misguided followers, so it is their teachings that should be looked at, not the actions of a few individuals.

Unfortunately, in the media, whenever a Muslim commits a heinous act, he is labeled a "Muslim terrorist". However, when Serbs murder and rape innocent women in Bosnia, they are not called "Christian terrorists", nor are the activities in Northern Ireland labeled "Christian terrorism". Also, when right-wing Christians in the U. S. bomb abortion clinics, they are not called "Christian terrorists".

Reflecting on these facts, one could certainly conclude that there is a double-standard in the media! Although religious feelings play a significant role in the previously mentioned "Christian" conflicts, the media does not apply religious labels because they assume that such barbarous acts have nothing to do with the teachings of Christianity.

However, when something happens involving a Muslim, they often try to put the blame on Islam itself -- and not the misguided individual. Certainly, Islamic Law allows war --- any religion or civilization that did not would never survive --- but it certainly does not condone attacks against innocent people, women or children. The Arabic word "jihad", simply means "to struggle".

The word for "war" in Arabic is "harb", not "jihad". "Struggling", i.e. "making jihad", to defend Islam, Muslims or to liberate a land where Muslims are oppressed is certainly allowed (and even encouraged) in Islam. However, any such activities must be done according to the teachings of Islam. Islam also clearly forbids "taking the law into your own hands", which means that individual Muslims cannot go around deciding who they want to kill, punish or torture.

Trial and punishment must be carried out by a lawful authority and a knowledgeable judge. Also, when looking at events in the Muslim World, it should be kept in mind that a long period of colonialism ended fairly recently in most Muslim countries. During this time, the peoples in this countries were culturally, materially and religiously exploited - mostly by the so-called "Christian" nations of the West.

Islam may seem exotic or even extreme in the modern world. Perhaps this is because religion doesn't dominate everyday life in the West, whereas Islam is considered a 'way of life' for Muslims and they make no division between secular and sacred in their lives. Like Christianity, Islam permits fighting in self-defense, in defense of religion, or on the part of those who have been expelled forcibly from their homes. It lays down strict rules of combat which include prohibitions against harming civilians and against destroying crops, trees and livestock.

Nowhere does Islam enjoin the killing of innocents.. The Quran says :"Fight in the cause of Allah against those who fight you, but do not transgress limits. Allah does not love transgressors." (Quran 2:190)

" If they seek peace, then seek you peace. And trust in Allah for He is the One that heareth and knoweth all things." (Quran 8:61)

"Whoever kills a soul, unless for a soul, or for corruption done in the land, it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one, it is as if he had saved mankind entirely" (Qur'an 5:32)

War, therefore, is the last resort, and is subject to the rigorous conditions laid down by the sacred law. Even though the Middle East was home to fewer terrorist incidents than Latin America and Europe, for example, it is still regarded as the region where terrorism is rooted.

According to a recent US State Department report, Patterns of Global Terrorism, 272 terrorist events occurred in Europe, 92 in Latin America and 45 in the Middle East. Sixty-two anti-US attacks occurred in Latin America last year, 21 in Europe and 6 in the Middle East.

These numbers represent the terrorist trend and not an anomaly, whereby the majority of perpetrators are not linked to the Middle East or Islam. The Red Army Faction in Germany, the Basque Separatists in Spain, the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, the Shining Path in Peru and the National Liberation Army in Columbia are not viewed with the same horror as terrorist groups of Muslim background.

There is no moral justification for terrorism regardless of the ethnic or religious background of the perpetrator or the victim, but the factual basis of terrorism has been either hidden or twisted in the public's perception of this policy problem, especially in congressional hearings on terrorism. The countries with the worst terrorist records in the world are not in the Middle East either. They are not even Muslim countries outside the Middle East. They are Columbia and Germany, havens for drug lords and neo-Nazis.

The perception in the Middle East is that US policy does not serve the peoples' interests; it protects Israel, while it slaps sanctions on and takes military actions against countries which disobey its policy, resulting in suffering, starvation and even slaughter, all in the name of teaching the tyrants a lesson. The priorities in the Middle East for the US are not human rights and democracy, but rather oil and Israeli superiority. Consequently, anti-American sentiment increases.

This mood of the general public is then characterized as "Islamic fundamentalism", even though the resentment is not rooted in religion. When it turns violent, it is termed "radical Islamic fundamentalism" or "Islamic terrorism." The various "terrorism experts" promote linkage to the Middle East before any other possibility every time terrorism is speculated. They exploit the human suffering of the victims, their families, and the fears of the American public.

Indeed, extremists of Muslim backgrounds are violating the norms of Islamic justice and should be held accountable for their criminal behavior.

An Israeli journalist, Yo'av Karny, reporting on the events in Chechnya made a striking observation about this development: "The West will be told--and will be inclined to believe--that the oppression of the Chechens is part and parcel of a cosmic struggle against 'Islamic extremism' that rages from Gaza to Algeria, from Tehran to Khartoum. Russians will seek Western sympathy. They should not be given it."

The issue is not Chechnya, and it is not even about Islam and the West. Debates about religious wars and cultural clashes only distract us from the real issue: the powerful want to continue dominating the powerless, manipulating facts to influence public opinion, hence maintaining the status quo.

Wednesday : 13/11/2002

From : http://www.islamweb.net/ver2/archive...ang=E&id=32951

[Darkdale]

Keeping Tabs on Islamic Terrorism

Keeping an eye on Fundamentalist Islam

These two links are definitely biased in their perspective, but I think we all need to be realistic about the reality of terrorism and Islamic extremism. Islam is a religion that is currently growing at a very rapid rate and there are some that are willing to use violence and madness to accomplish power. Now, Christianity did the same thing so many years ago and while it wasn't "all Christians", one would be foolish to neglect noting the corruption of the religion during the times of the crusades and inquisitions. The same is true of Islam today. Until the religion of Islam is the number one activist group against fundamentalist Islam, I'll view the entire religion with suspicion, with confidence that such suspicion is justified.

[michel]

Originally Posted by Darkdale

Keeping Tabs on Islamic Terrorism

Keeping an eye on Fundamentalist Islam

These two links are definitely biased in their perspective, but I think we all need to be realistic about the reality of terrorism and Islamic extremism. Islam is a religion that is currently growing at a very rapid rate and there are some that are willing to use violence and madness to accomplish power. Now, Christianity did the same thing so many years ago and while it wasn't "all Christians", one would be foolish to neglect noting the corruption of the religion during the times of the crusades and inquisitions. The same is true of Islam today. Until the religion of Islam is the number one activist group against fundamentalist Islam, I'll view the entire religion with suspicion, with confidence that such suspicion is justified.

Well said; I heartily concur.

[Jayhawker Soule]

Originally Posted by Ahmadso

"Whoever kills a soul, unless for a soul, or for corruption done in the land, it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one, it is as if he had saved mankind entirely" (Qur'an 5:32)

This is a blood-chilling statement. Do uncovered women reflect "corruption done in the land"? What of dhimmis insisting on equal rights?

Quote malleable scripture all you wish: reactionary Islam arms terrorism every bit as much as reactionary Christianity armed the Crusades. Show me the jihad against terrorism and I'll gladly listen to the verses its members quote.

[Ahmadso]

Hi

Are you think that the uncovered women must be killed ?

No, The muslims musn't kill the uncovered women, You misunderstand the verse, the "corruption done in the land" that obligate to kill the person who do it , are somethings explained it the prophet Muhammad(PBUH), But the uncovered women aren't "corruption done in the land" that obligate to Muslims to kill this uncovered women. And I explain more : The muslims mustn't kill the uncovered women.

what you mean about this sentence "What of dhimmis insisting on equal rights?
" , explain more please!


If you don't understand me, I will explain more. My English language is weak , therefore If you don't understand me, say that to me.