Why did Allah create gay animals?

[Sahar]

Originally Posted by Mr Spinkles

Right but in one case, someone benefits and someone is harmed (kittens), which is similar to a disease, where someone benefits (the germs) and someone is harmed. In the gay behavior case, no one is harmed. That aspect is unlike a disease and unlike kittens being eaten. Does that make sense?

So the cat example is a disease or not?

[Mr Spinkles]

Originally Posted by not4me

If the author of this thread wanted to prove or argue that homosexuality is natural and according to him "natural" includes disorders and thus abnormal behavior then (in the context of the homosexuality debates) the point of this thread is moot and irrelevant.

I wanted to ask Muslims if they believe gay behavior occurs in animals, and if not, what do they think of the scientific studies, videos, photos, books, etc. on gay behavior in animals.

The responses so far have been very interesting. One person accepts it is true, one person (not4me) says it's interesting but not yet convinced, and another person (Fatihah) insists it is all a fraud. Thanks for your responses.

[Fatihah]

Originally Posted by Draka

Liar.

Response: Likewise.

[Mr Spinkles]

Originally Posted by not4me

So the cat example is a disease or not?

Someone is harmed in the cat example and the disease example. Someone is not harmed in the gay example. Fair?

[Draka]

Originally Posted by Fatihah

Response: Likewise.

So you admit it then. How nice.

[9-10ths_Penguin]

*** Staff Advisory ***

This thread is in the Muslim DIR forum. Non-Muslim members are not permitted to post except for respectful questions. Debating is not allowed by anyone.

Please remember our rules as you participate in the thread.

Thanks,

9-10ths_Penguin
Mod

[Fatihah]

Originally Posted by Mr Spinkles

That's fascinating, thanks for sharing your view.

Do observations of some black, and some spotted individual leopards contradict the scientific method?


Photograph of a leopard. Leopards have spots.

Photograph of a black leopard. Contradicts scientific method? Must be fake?

Response: No. There is no contradiction.

[Fatihah]

Originally Posted by Draka

So you admit it then. How nice.

Response: Likewise.

[Draka]

Originally Posted by Fatihah

Response: Likewise.

I didn't admit anything, but you did with "likewise", or do you not know what that word means?

Anyway, since there's been a second mod post in here I'll go ahead and leave. There's no use trying to reason with an admitted liar anyway.

[Sahar]

Originally Posted by Mr Spinkles

Someone is harmed in the cat example and the disease example. Someone is not harmed in the gay example. Fair?

Does this answer my question?