![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
A Hebrew makes a Hebrew, and such a person is called a convert. A
convert does not make a convert. [Some people] are as they [are] and make others [like them], while others simply are. ---Meyer A Hebrew makes a Hebrew, who is called a proselyte. Yet a proselyte cannot make another proselyte. Some exist just as they […] and make others like themselves, while others simply exist. --Philip smith So the Gospel of Philip. As we will see is an exploration of many Gnostic themes including sacraments, polarity, arguably sexuality and the Gnostic concepts behind divine union. Philip itself begins and plunges us straight into a series of wisdom teachings. Philip like Thomas is probably a series of compiled texts, Thomas being more parable and Philip more "sacramental." Scholars point to Philip being most likely Valentinian or perhaps Sethian. When it comes to Philip we find the question of Mary Magdalene as we will discover later. So Philip begins with no introduction,. We are thrown head long into Philip. We begin with a logion that states a Person can convert another person to be a Hebrew, but a convert cannot make a Hebrew. Much like saying some people are born as certain people, they can bring others into that stream of being, but those converted are unlikely to be able to convert new people. You are what you are. You are born a Hebrew, by blood and thus culture and religion. We find this in witch craft and other similar "paths" that state one is born into a tradition. You are naturally such and such. The Coptic here is generally accepted as Hebrew not Jew (in translation.) This is perhaps then arguing stating a Gnostic is a Gnostic…and that is that! Or more accurately an early Christian or perhaps a Jewish Christian like an Ebionite or Nazorean. But whatever the case, this is clearly showing distinction between those who are "of the Gospel of Philip" (or "the living father" for example) and those who are not. Further: Gospel of Philip
__________________
To be a Gnostic, one must not be a Gnostic |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |