|
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
07-02-2009, 09:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
PROOF: Gnostic/Canon scriptures written same time-frame!
But the most compelling and indisputable proof that all Christian scriptures were written by the Apostles and all in the same time frame is that both Canon/Gnostic do not record a significant event that took place in early Christian life, the Temple destruction. This event isn't documented in no Christian literature, not the Canon, nor the Gnostic. Surely this cataclysmic event spoken by Jesus would have made the pages if these texts were written afterwards.
When were the Books of the New Testament Written? 30 A.D. : Jesus is Crucified, Dies and is Resurrected 35 A.D. : Gospel of Matthew 42 A.D. : Gospel of Mark 42 A.D. : Gospel of John 59 A.D. : Gospel of Luke 64 to 65 A.D. :Book of 1Peter 66 to 67 A.D . : Book of Jude THESE DATES ARE TOO FAR BETWEEN Yet the Apostles Gospels are pretty much similar. So why are their dates so far between? Because these are the surviving copies. All Christian scriptures (Canon/Gnostic) were written by the Apostles in the same time-frame. The birth of Christianity conflicted with the Roman worship and as Christians went underground many copies were made to ensure that it would survive the persecution. Christianity was illegal under Roman law. Christians were persecuted and their manuscripts confiscated this how the Empire later was able to compile the New Testament. And at first when Christianity was legalised the many Roman councils removed Gnostic text that conflicted with Roman Worship, decades later however, the Empire abandoned their pagan faith and accepted Jesus (Christianity) but the lost Books were never put back. This validates that Gnostic literature's must be accepted in order to complete the faith called Christianity. Everything about the Christian faith is based on what Jesus said, everything, because Jesus is the cornerstone of that faith! And another note: This is also why there are many copies found of the same text of the dead sea scrolls and codex. Many copies were made, some survived better then others explaining the multiple copies. The Dialogue of the Savior is single surviving copy. Written for Jesus as he spoke to his Apostles. What a treat! The Dialogue of the Savior -- The Nag Hammadi Library The Dialogue of the Saviour 
|
|
#2
07-02-2009, 09:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
-- pending further review --
|
|
#3
07-02-2009, 10:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
This table has been on a lot of threads now.
 Shame it's still wrong!
|
|
#4
07-02-2009, 10:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
People that accept what the Empire accepted as the Christian faith are accepting incomplete Christian beliefs because the Empire who compiled the New Testment were Pagans, and did not sellect all books with the words of Jesus .
FACT: Jesus was crucified! FACT: Apostles were martyred! FACT: Christians were persecuted! The Fact that these events took place proves beyond doubt that Jesus was real. That the Apostles were killed for writing down his teachings. That the Christians were persecuted for continuing in making copies only to have the same Empire that confirmed these events turn around and compile the New Testament excluding texts (Gnostic) that interfered with their Roman worship is proof of authority that Christian scriptures were written originally by the Apostles through the actions that the Romans (authorities of that era) took in consequence of these events. Last edited by VinDino11; 07-02-2009 at 11:55 AM..
|
|
#5
07-02-2009, 10:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Childish attempts to shift the burden of proof do little but further expose you.
__________________
-- pending further review --
|
|
#7
07-02-2009, 10:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
We have yet to see any relevance on your behalf.
|
|
#8
07-02-2009, 10:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW Gospel Of Matthew When were the gospels written and by whom? | Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry The Gospel of Mark - ReligionFacts Dating and Origins of Mark’s Gospel: When Was the Gospel According to Mark Written? THE GOSPEL OF MARK There's a lot of information on 2 in particular because these are the "earliest" in your opinion, being made only a few years after. Is that enough?
|
|
#9
07-02-2009, 10:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
-- pending further review --
|
|
#10
07-02-2009, 10:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
"Various estimates have placed the date of Matthew's composition anywhere from AD 50 - to AD 100." Blue Letter Bible - Study Tools In case you haven't notice, it makes no difference on how scholars disagree on dates, because the argument in the OP is air-tight regardless where the expert put those dates. The Apostles originally wrote all Christian scriptures!
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
