![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does spreading the message of religion require any less recruitment of media savvy spin doctors than furthering the aims of a political party in the next electoral cycle necessitates?
__________________
"If a lion could talk, you wouldn't understand him" - Plagiarism |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Actually, I'd say no spin doctors are necessary, period. I think their presence in politics is detrimental; I don't think thier presence in religion would be any better.
__________________
The word 'poop' is cool: it's transitive, but only for 'pants'. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
friend Ozzie,
Kindly understand that the way or religion is all about the path to that state of mind which is STILL. Whatever one knows is in the mind and whatever others try to pass information even about religion is all food for the MIND. To get to still the mind, no information or knowledge helps. Thats something no guru can help. Its an individual jouney / understanding / art / technique / whatever one may call it but is individual and the state is called no-mind. Spin doctors can caputure the mind can get more consumers for their religion, collect more money for their organisation etc but cannot make more and more people ENLIGHTENED. Love & rgds |