Frank Castle the Scientist of GOD. (Earth, scriptures, science)

[Panda]

Originally Posted by Frank Castle

You don't know the first thing about Enoch or His book, stop lying, say the truth, the truth doesn't hurt as much as you think.

Don't insult Draka. How would you know what she knows?

[Engyo]

Originally Posted by Frank Castle

You don't know the first thing about Enoch or His book, stop lying, say the truth, the truth doesn't hurt as much as you think.

I'm sorry - the truth you are referring to is all in your head, and I don't know what it is. As for whether it hurts or not, how would I know?

[camanintx]

Originally Posted by Frank Castle

And how would that explain when the Earth does go half way around the Sun that we can still see the constellations?

It's called perspective. To experience this personally, tonight walk out on a set of busy railroad tracks and keep telling yourself that the light in the distance is not really moving.

[Frank Castle]

Originally Posted by camanintx

It's called perspective. To experience this personally, tonight walk out on a set of busy railroad tracks and keep telling yourself that the light in the distance is not really moving.

Here's alittle of you're science fiction perspective, the Sun would have to have an atmosphere if science would be correct, its powerful grav/pull would be overly
massive for our tiny atmosphere to bounce around it. According to the feild experts that measured the Sun, the Earth would fit 100 times in it, WAY to BIG for our inertia.

Plus the Moon that has no atmosphere would fall right off the Earth and into the Sun, but it doesn't because the Sun is as big as the Moon.

[Panda]

Originally Posted by Frank Castle

Here's alittle of you're science fiction perspective, the Sun would have to have an atmosphere if science would be correct, its powerful grav/pull would be overly
massive for our tiny atmosphere to bounce around it. According to the feild experts that measured the Sun, the Earth would fit 100 times in it, WAY to BIG for our inertia.

Plus the Moon that has no atmosphere would fall right off the Earth and into the Sun, but it doesn't because the Sun is as big as the Moon.

Oh this makes me laugh. RF should have an award for the stupidest poster, you would totally get it.

[camanintx]

Originally Posted by Frank Castle

Here's alittle of you're science fiction perspective, the Sun would have to have an atmosphere if science would be correct, its powerful grav/pull would be overly
massive for our tiny atmosphere to bounce around it. According to the feild experts that measured the Sun, the Earth would fit 100 times in it, WAY to BIG for our inertia.

Plus the Moon that has no atmosphere would fall right off the Earth and into the Sun, but it doesn't because the Sun is as big as the Moon.

Forget about Einstein, you still haven't figured out basic Newtonian physics. Sit down some time and calculate the gravitational force exerted on you by the Earth, the Moon and the Sun and see why you don't go flying off into space.

[Frank Castle]

Originally Posted by camanintx

Forget about Einstein, you still haven't figured out basic Newtonian physics. Sit down some time and calculate the gravitational force exerted on you by the Earth, the Moon and the Sun and see why you don't go flying off into space.

You spend you're time calculating stupidity, look at it this way, if the Earth was spinning which direction would it spin, N-E-W-S, now picture the conveyor belts at the airports that help you commute from one end to another. When you're standing still no problem, when you walk with the conveyor's direction still no problem, but walk backwards very difficult, how silly can you be!

[9-10ths_Penguin]

Originally Posted by Frank Castle

You spend you're time calculating stupidity, look at it this way, if the Earth was spinning which direction would it spin, N-E-W-S, now picture the conveyor belts at the airports that help you commute from one end to another. When you're standing still no problem, when you walk with the conveyor's direction still no problem, but walk backwards very difficult, how silly can you be!

There's no problem if you're just walking on the conveyor and only care about how far you get in relation to the conveyor belt.

When you do care about stuff "off the belt", well, that's why NASA launches its rockets from Florida and not California: if you want to launch a rocket into orbit, you want to be as close to the equator as possible and to launch it East. Assuming you want to launch it out over water (so that no people are under it if something goes wrong), then in the US, you want to be at the south end of the East coast. Launching rockets from Cape Kennedy gives NASA's rockets means that their rockets start out with 900 km/h (IIRC) of the required orbital speed even before the engines fire.

[camanintx]

Originally Posted by Frank Castle

You spend you're time calculating stupidity, look at it this way, if the Earth was spinning which direction would it spin, N-E-W-S, now picture the conveyor belts at the airports that help you commute from one end to another. When you're standing still no problem, when you walk with the conveyor's direction still no problem, but walk backwards very difficult, how silly can you be!

Sorry, but your argument is flawed as my kids have no more problem walking backwards on the airport conveyors than I have walking against the Earth's spin.