Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Religious Debates / General Religious Debates
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 05-27-2008, 04:12 PM
logician's Avatar
logician Offline
Religion: atheist
Title:atheist - skeptic
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 3,621
Frubals: 474867
logician eats frubals for breakfast
logician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfast
logician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfastlogician eats frubals for breakfast
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heneni View Post
There is only one.

Heneni

Minus one.
__________________
"Atheism is a non-prophet organization"

George Carlin
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 05-27-2008, 05:55 PM
Jeremiah's Avatar
Jeremiah Offline
Religion: Faithless
Title:Godless Heathen
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 737
Frubals: 181998
Jeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond repute
Jeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond reputeJeremiah has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwolf View Post
Except that Buddhists do not view themselves as "above" everyone else, and Buddha never said that his way was the only way, nor did he say he was a god, by the way. (In fact, when people asked him if he was a god, he specifically said, "no.") One Buddhist philosophy is "whatever works for you is fine." I know because my dad is a Buddhist. Now, not all Buddhists are like this, I know, but it is in the Buddhist doctrine to accept others for who they are and not to view themselves as "right."

And I think your argument on argumentation(... ) more has to do with a debate. To me, a debate and an argument are two different things; an argument, whether well thought-out or not, is an attempt by someone to bring another person over to their views, whereas a debate is more about trying to explain and back up why someone believes as they do. That's just my view, though. And of course, let's face it. A good argument, that is one that is well thought-out and civilized, is great fun, and for me is a guilty pleasure.
Go back to my first post. You'll see that I used the word fight; I did that for a reason. I felt the word argue could cause confusion but you got confused anyways. I also feel you are confused between an individual and a philosophy. I used the word Buddhist in references to a individual in the guidance of the religion. Religions say allot of things and are not always followed as written. Sorry next time I will try to make my post more understandable. Thanks for the conversation.
__________________
"To be, or not to be: that is the question"
William Shakespeare
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 PM.


© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.