Homosexuality and Religion (Jesus Christ, agnostic, LDS, bible, God)

[mball1297]

Originally Posted by Bishadi

This is the problem; some idiots think it is a right to flaunt their 'gaydom' and that is the ill regard to others, period!

I know what you mean. Some idiots think it is right to flaunt their complete ignorance and bigotry and that is the ill regard to others, period! (Just to be clear, because I feel it's necessary in your case, I'm referring to you here.)

[Bishadi]

Originally Posted by mball1297

I know what you mean. Some idiots think it is right to flaunt their complete ignorance and bigotry and that is the ill regard to others, period!

Sorry to burst your bubble, but 'others' is the priority and it is simply that I cannot find compassion for the few to over run compassion for the majority...

That is your bigotry. Claiming care and compassion yet focused only on the 'feelings' of the few rather than the majority. Limited sight, limited comprehension and definitely, reduced compassion.

(Just to be clear, because I feel it's necessary in your case, I'm referring to you here.)

need any more be said or are you enjoying yourself?

You must not know very many attorneys then

only what they have done to our country. I mean heck now equality is supposed to mean, raise the selfish to the front as long as they got the money to pay for it.

[texan1]

Originally Posted by Bishadi

Sorry to burst your bubble, but 'others' is the priority and it is simply that I cannot find compassion for the few to over run compassion for the majority....

Why do you think it is impossible to have compassion for everyone?

[Mestemia]

Originally Posted by Bishadi

Sorry to burst your bubble, but 'others' is the priority and it is simply that I cannot find compassion for the few to over run compassion for the majority...

Wow.
The minority is not supposed to impose their self on the majority, but you are not only fine with the majority imposing them self on the minority, you have joined in with them in imposing them self on the minority.

Originally Posted by Bishadi

That is your bigotry. Claiming care and compassion yet focused only on the 'feelings' of the few rather than the majority. Limited sight, limited comprehension and definitely, reduced compassion.

You appeal to numbers argument for justifying your bigotry does not make you any less a bigot.

Originally Posted by Bishadi

only what they have done to our country. I mean heck now equality is supposed to mean, raise the selfish to the front as long as they got the money to pay for it.

I completely agree.
Though you did forget to add that it is fine for the majority to repress the minority and god forbid the minority not like being treated equally.

I agree with Mike126:

this sanctimonious crap disgusts me.

[Bishadi]

Originally Posted by texan1

Why do you think it is impossible to have compassion for everyone?

Never said anything of the sort but the priority when identifying a pro or against upon an issue of this magnitude, is to observe life and the existence of the total thereof, as the first requisite.

Every line item suggested is pointing out that the acceptance is not what the issue is, it is the right to flaunt and openly convey a sexual preference in open public and with no care of the adversities the imposition may cause to others.

In church, most do not wear a t-back and topless; in respect of people and the total (god).

As in each and every interaction of people, that should always be the prime requisite.

If in a social group for example, a nude gatherings, then so be it, but then the only persons affected are them within the gathering.

The idea being represented is that 'we the people' are the first requisite to compassionate associations and not to 'accept' personal preferences as normal.

Each and every person should be caring for the majority and the development of our children, our future as the priority over and above their own needs of acceptance.

[mball1297]

Originally Posted by Bishadi

Sorry to burst your bubble, but 'others' is the priority and it is simply that I cannot find compassion for the few to over run compassion for the majority...

Then maybe you should learn what compassion is. Compassion has nothing to do with a majority or minority. You show compassion on an individual basis, caring for each person regardless of the faults you may or may not see in them.

That is your bigotry. Claiming care and compassion yet focused only on the 'feelings' of the few rather than the majority. Limited sight, limited comprehension and definitely, reduced compassion.

Again, maybe look up bigotry. Bigotry is an unreasonable and unfounded dislike of a certain group of people, kind of like yours toward homosexuals. I don't know who this majority is you keep bringing up, but the majority of people I know accept homosexuality as perfectly normal and natural. Even if they didn't, you're promoting the authority of the majority, which is not compassionate or just. At some point the majority of people thought that slavery was acceptable. Why did people stop "being compassionate" to the majority there? Probably because the majority was wrong.

the majority of people think that killing is wrong, and I agree there. It has nothing to do with whether or not they're the majority, it's whether or not the thing is right or wrong. IF the perception of the majority is wrong, then they need to change.

[mball1297]

Originally Posted by Bishadi

Never said anything of the sort but the priority when identifying a pro or against upon an issue of this magnitude, is to observe life and the existence of the total thereof, as the first requisite.

Every line item suggested is pointing out that the acceptance is not what the issue is, it is the right to flaunt and openly convey a sexual preference in open public and with no care of the adversities the imposition may cause to others.

In church, most do not wear a t-back and topless; in respect of people and the total (god).

As in each and every interaction of people, that should always be the prime requisite.

If in a social group for example, a nude gatherings, then so be it, but then the only persons affected are them within the gathering.

The idea being represented is that 'we the people' are the first requisite to compassionate associations and not to 'accept' personal preferences as normal.

Each and every person should be caring for the majority and the development of our children, our future as the priority over and above their own needs of acceptance.

Basically you're saying that homosexuals should not be openly homosexual because it offends some people. The problem is that it's not the homosexuals who need to change, then, it's the sensitivity of those people who are offended. It's perfectly fine for homosexuals to show their sexuality to the same degree that heterosexuals can in public, and if someone has a problem with it, then that's too bad for them. They should get used to it, or go somewhere else.

[Bishadi]

Basically you're saying that homosexuals should not be openly homosexual because it offends some people. The problem is that it's not the homosexuals who need to change, then, it's the sensitivity of those people who are offended.

So let’s look at normal

In behavior, normal refers to a lack of significant deviation from the average. The phrase "not normal" is often applied in a negative sense (asserting that someone or some situation is improper, sick, etc.). Abnormality varies greatly in how pleasant or unpleasant this is for other people; somebody may half-jokingly be called "pleasantly disturbed".
The Oxford English Dictionary defines "normal" as 'conforming to a standard'. This, although almost right, is not entirely correct. "A normal" is someone who conforms to the ideals of society.

So I was correct………… you want the majority to change for a minority.

It's perfectly fine for homosexuals to show their sexuality to the same degree that heterosexuals can in public, and if someone has a problem with it, then that's too bad for them. They should get used to it, or go somewhere else.

See you shared it perfectly.

You share that….Everyone else is wrong and the gays are who have it correctly…..

Then maybe you should learn what compassion is. Compassion has nothing to do with a majority or minority. You show compassion on an individual basis, caring for each person regardless of the faults you may or may not see in them

back to the basic english

Compassion

is an understanding of the emotional state of another or oneself. Not to be confused with empathy, compassion is often combined with a desire to alleviate or reduce the suffering of another or to show special kindness to those who suffer. However, compassion may lead an individual to feel empathy with another person.

Compassion is often characterized through actions, wherein a person acting with compassion will seek to aid those they feel compassionate for. Acts of compassion are generally considered those which take into account the pain of others and attempt to alleviate that pain. In this sense, the various forms of the Golden Rule are in part based on the concept of compassion, if also on the concept of empathy.
Compassion differs from other forms of helpful or humane behavior in that its focus is primarily on the alleviation of pain and suffering

Again, maybe look up bigotry. Bigotry is an unreasonable and unfounded dislike of a certain group of people,

So since you wish every one else to change for the minority, then now we all know who the bigot is on t