![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#521
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Everything visible is within the universe. Things visible are up to 13.7 billion light years away. Thus we have a universe with at least 13.7 billion light years of width, length, and height. |
|
#522
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Universe has limits, we do not need to know the limits to know they exist. The Universe has to have limits as it is expanding from one single point in the universe, like a bubble getting bigger and bigger.
__________________
|
|
#523
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The atom is not enough proof of intelligence to you? Okay, try this, design something that an entire universe will be based on? Something better than the atom. |
|
#524
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is a nonsensical question. What are you asking? To design a better thing than an atom? Define better?
__________________
|
|
#525
|
||||
|
||||
|
Alright; but you said, "it's width, length, and height are not known." If it's not unknown, then to whom is it known? (regardless of the numbers)
__________________
I have never agreed with my other self wholly. The truth of the matter seems to lie between us. - Khalil Gibran Brad Chat
|
|
#526
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Define better? Try Dictionary.com. |
|
#527
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
To whoever cares to look it up. It's quite readily available on the internet and at your local library. And, to be more correct, what I said was: Quote:
|
|
#528
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't be stupid. How could the atom be better? Should it be smaller? Should it be bright pink? No you are asking a nonsensical and stupid question that has no relevance at all.
__________________
|
|
#529
|
||||
|
||||
|
Although I am no astrophysicist, even I can understand that there does not have to be boundaries. What you are stating is the view of some scientists who think we are within a "closed" system. It is entirely possible that if one follows a given point infinitely in any direction they will never reach the "edge" of the physical universe. My own theory is that the physical universe is growing faster than the speed of light (at the supposed "boundary areas", that is) and so our measurements will never be able to keep up with the expansion as our perception and instruments are bound by the current laws of physics. Oh well, I never assume I am right, so there is always room for corrections unlike those who have things all figured out. If I wanted to be a total snot, I could get indignant and demand folks prove me wrong, lol. Good luck.
__________________
It is true that the early bird gets the worm, however, it is the second mouse, that gets the cheese. |
|
#530
|
||||
|