Deception and harrassment in the name of God (contraceptives, choice)

[Mykola]

Originally Posted by Pah

Deception and harrassment in the name of God

The topic itself is poorly formulated.
No deception or harassment can be done in the name of God.
So, relax


...False or vague assumptions cannot lead to the truth, friend.

[Bright-ness' Shadow]

Originally Posted by Mykola

The topic itself is poorly formulated.
No deception or harassment can be done in the name of God.
So, relax


...False or vague assumptions cannot lead to the truth, friend.

Nor can sin be a voice or act of God.

[Mykola]

Originally Posted by Pah

Nor can sin be a voice or act of God.

Exactly!

[Bright-ness' Shadow]

Originally Posted by Mykola

Exactly!

Thank you! These people with the pseudo-clinic are thus godless but who act for God's purpose or what they think is God's purpose. Sounds like the work of the Devil, as revialists are prone to bemoan.

[Mykola]

Originally Posted by Pah

Thank you! These people with the pseudo-clinic are thus godless but who act for God's purpose or what they think is God's purpose. Sounds like the work of the Devil, as revialists are prone to bemoan.

You seem to be deeply touched by this pseudo-clynics issue...

I think that if it weren't for abortions, which is merely an euphemism for infanticide, there would be no pseudo-clynics problem at all. How d'you think?

Or you think that those 'pseudo-clynicists' would 'harass' women anyway, just because?

Besides, I would like to see your definition of harassment...

[Bright-ness' Shadow]

Originally Posted by Mykola

You seem to be deeply touched by this pseudo-clynics issue...

Yes, I'm always trouble by hypocrisy and those who support it or fogive it.

I think that if it weren't for abortions, which is merely an euphemism for infanticide, there would be no pseudo-clynics problem at all. How d'you think?

I think there would be other ways to intefer in other people's sex.

Or you think that those 'pseudo-clynicists' would 'harass' women anyway, just because?Yes, under a different guise.

Besides, I would like to see your definition of harassment...

Did you read the article?

[Mykola]

Originally Posted by Pah

Yes, I'm always trouble by hypocrisy and those who support it or fogive it.

These people are not the only hypocrites... Why are you so fascinated by them?

Originally Posted by Pah

I think there would be other ways to intefer in other people's sex.

In what?
Fornication and infanticide being called other peoples' sex is a hypocrisy, isn't it?

Originally Posted by Pah

Yes, under a different guise.

Wow, you must be reading peoples' hearts!

Originally Posted by Pah

Did you read the article?

Browsed through...

By the way, I believe that calling infanticide 'Planned Parenthood' and 'options for health care' (!) is the dictionary definition of hypocrisy.

What did you say you feel towards hypocrisy? D'you dislike or otherwise?

[Bright-ness' Shadow]

Originally Posted by Mykola

These people are not the only hypocrites... Why are you so fascinated by them?

You make an argument against me that I should what? - abate thier condemnation because others do it? Are all your sins forgiven because they occur in other's behaviors - rhetorical, not personal.

Fornication and infanticide being called other peoples' sex is a hypocrisy, isn't it?

Nope!

Wow, you must be reading peoples' hearts!

Yep! Fairly easy to do when actions are not in accordance with the Word. We KNOW, for example, they have not God in thier hearts. I can say that about them because it was an uncontested point in my argument. They are ungodly

Browsed through...

Thanks for the attention - an informed debate is always nice.

By the way, I believe that calling infanticide 'Planned Parenthood' and 'options for health care' (!) is the dictionary definition of hypocrisy.

You seem to have trouble with generalities and specific missions and tasks of Planned Parenthood - an informed debate is always nice.

What did you say you feel towards hypocrisy? D'you dislike or otherwise?[/quote]I hope you don't have trouble with other deductions.

[evearael]

Thank you! These people with the pseudo-clinic are thus godless but who act for God's purpose or what they think is God's purpose. Sounds like the work of the Devil, as revialists are prone to bemoan.

I certain agree that if the events transpired precisely as was claimed in the e-mail, that these people are behaving contrary to the faith they seem to profess as well as violating several laws. I cannot condone their actions as they are portrayed.

[Bright-ness' Shadow]

Originally Posted by Mykola

...By the way, I believe that calling infanticide 'Planned Parenthood' and 'options for health care' (!) is the dictionary definition of hypocrisy....

The quote from the article is

legal options for health care.

Is this more deception from supporters of ungodly deception?