![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hear people say that they don't need God to be moral.
My question then is how is a person to choose? I suppose that a position could be taken that everything is moral. Then murder and rape and beastiality and torture are all fine and dandy. One could look at things logically. For instance Jezebel had a logical solution for Ahab's desire for a man's land. Simply kill the man and take his land. Can a person rely on laws or traditions? There once was a law that stores couldn't open on Sunday now there is no such law. Evidently laws change according to what people wish them to be. It used to be that holidays were celebrated on the traditional day but now holidays are often selebrated on a convenient monday. Evidently traditions change as well. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If so, then I'd say you're not really moral at all. If not, then you already know the answer to your question. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“Boobies over demons. That is my decision” ― Hero Yoshihiko |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Group morality can come about through mutual agreement. Kind of how we get our laws. Majority agreement to establish correct behavior. You may not personally agree with the morality of some laws but you have to obey or face the risk of civil punishment. Perhaps a more real threat then expecting God to take care of things. People also develop their own sense of morality. A person will usually act according to their own sense of right and wrong except when coerce or forced to act otherwise. Religion was a powerful way to coerce the masses into accepting a standard level of morality. Civil laws can do just as well as long as there is real enforcement. Otherwise people will naturally default to their individual sense of right and wrong which may cause problems with the larger group. The bottom line in the USA civil laws dictate acceptable group behavior. You are pretty much free to act according to your own sense of right and wrong as long as you obey civil laws or don't care about the risk of facing punishment for breaking them. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
A very little reflection will show what is needed for people to live harmoniously together. Add to that our natural empathy as a social species and a satisfactory morality follows easily. I do not see that encoding that morality in religion, together with much superfluous stuff designed to advantage clerics, brings any improvement. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Just a stray thought?
__________________
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you don't know that murder and rape aren't moral without your belief in god, then I'm very grateful that people like you have the bible to keep them from murdering, raping, and having sex with their pets.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
good and bad existed prior to religions.
end of story. people have moral's built in, I find this post a bit ignorant to think that humanity that survived 197,000 years without christianity is somehow now required to have religion and a deity as a crutch so it can traverse life without moral decay. [insert facepalm here] |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
They follow the shadow rather than the Son of God who is casting it. They don't see the Son of God. They'll follow their own shadow and give it the same value, the next day.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |