![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think of the Utah theater pulling "Brokeback Mountain?" | |||
| It's OK. Theater owners whould get to do what they want. |
|
16 | 50.00% |
| It's not OK. Movie goers should be able to choose what they will see. |
|
9 | 28.13% |
| It's great. That movie perhaps shouldn't have been made. |
|
0 | 0% |
| Awful. It's an award-winning film and we need to be more progressive. |
|
7 | 21.88% |
| Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
No, of course not. But whatever his reasons for pulling the film (fear, he finds it objectionable, etc.), this is another incident that shows the bias against BLGT people in general in our society. Imagine if a movie theater pulled a movie because it contained an interracial relationship. Would people be OK with that happening? To me, film is art. Some of it I'm going to like, and others I won't, and I believe than none of it should be censored from the adult public. We have a choice to see it or not, no one is making us view any film.
__________________
Join the Impact Matthew 7:12, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" |
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow nobody at all thought the movie should not have been made! That's unusual, normally we have at least one or two votes for the erm "anti-gay" choice.
__________________
|
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
I voted "It's OK," but that needs some qualification. I do think it's okay for theater owners to show whatever they want. If I owned a theater, I certainly wouldn't be showing The Passion of the Christ, and I wouldn't want anybody telling me I was obligated to show it.
On the other hand, I do think Larry Miller sounds like a jackass.
__________________
|
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
It just seems strange to me that in this day and age there would still be a controversy over a well made film about two men in love. But I live in my own little bubble, I suppose.
__________________
Then I came back from where I'd been. My room, it looked the same - but there was nothing left between The Nameless and the name. - Leonard Cohen. |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Here's the quote from the article Heath Ledger angry at ban Quote:
Last edited by jonny; 01-11-2006 at 05:30 PM. |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Bearing in mind you don't know what the question was that prompted the response regarding what the Mormons in Utah maybe found controversial, I don't think you can really make a judgement on what level of ignorance he was expressing with his comment. If someone ran up to you on a red carpet at a premiere, shoved a tape recorder in your face and said,'How do you feel about cinemas in Utah pulling the film?', how would you respond? Judging by the fact that he said 'Well, I'd heard that West Virginia was going to ban it', you don't even know that this wasn't the first time he'd heard about the whole SLC cinema thing, and you certainly don't know how it was represented to him by the people asking the questions. Just because 'most of the Mormons in Utah' don't watch R rated movies, doesn't mean that they have no opinions on them.
__________________
'NEVERMORE!!'
Last edited by lady_lazarus; 01-11-2006 at 05:59 PM. |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() You're right. Maybe I should be critisizing the Australian media for its reporting, but I call it like I see it. Most of "the Mormons in Utah" that I've talked to did NOT agree with what Larry Miller did, and those who have heard the quote from the all-mightly Ledger have not responded favorably towards him either. If Larry Miller pulled the film because he was worried about what the Mormons would think he's a M-O-R-O-N. Like I said earlier, most members of the LDS church won't watch or rarely watch rated-R movies anyway. It has nothing to do with the homosexuality in the movie. *If* he pulled it because of what the Mormons would think, he is not only a Moron, but he is also a hypocrite. He can't pretend to run his businesses like a good Mormon and then serve alcohol at the Utah Jazz and Baseball games, allow his places to be open on Sunday, show other rated-R movies, etc. I'm still waiting for his comments on the PR-mess that he's created for my final judgment, but I have a feeling that he's going to be silent on this one and hope it blows over. There are plenty of theaters in Utah that Larry Miller doesn't own. I betcha that if people want to see this movie, they'll see it anyway, regardless of whether or not one of many theater chains is showing it. Personally, I think that the studios were waiting for something like this to happen to get some more publicity for the film out. Larry Miller fell into their trap. He deserves any boycotts of his businesses that he gets. As for me, stuff like this makes me embarassed to be one of "the Mormons in Utah." Last edited by jonny; 01-11-2006 at 06:17 PM. |
|
#49
|