![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have wondered why the Bush administration doesn't seem to mention polygamy with the same fervor he talks about gay marriage. Polygamy exists in the U.S. I don't think I have ever heard him mention this when he talks about the sanctity of marriage. What do you think about polygamy?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I though polygamy was a game played by parrots?
![]()
__________________
My life is an open book; if you don't like the read, put me back on the shelf ....................
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmm, Interesting carrdero. A practical application to the issue.
On another note, the role of polygyny is often associated with the FLDS in America (not to be confused with the LDS who, in simple terms, abandoned the practice for statehood), has been viewed from the outside as abusive, with regard to the rights of women. And the speculated bartering (Church sanctioned marriage in the FLDS lexicon) of young women, some as young as 14 to older men, some as old as 70, seems quite repugnant to the majority of citizen in the US and Canada. Not to mention the obvious sexual abuse implications in such an arrangement. The most powerful FLDS communities are quite secretive and seem (from what I've read) to have a cult like status. I think there is an effort to tread softly with these groups. Waco comes to mind in terms of the wrong kind of approach or at least as what a confrontation could escalate to. Coupled with the freedom of religion elements of the constitution both in America and Canada (we have polygyny groups here in Canada as well. Associated with the FLDS in Utah) . I think the governments are in a position of damned if you do, damned if you don't. A sticky situation to say the least. Last edited by Scorn; 02-10-2005 at 07:20 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
If all parties are able to and do consent I see no problem.
The same possibility for abuse exists within traditional marraige as well.
__________________
If my calculations are correct .. SLINKY + ESCALATOR = EVERLASTING FUN |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
When did we last have this thread? Short time only guys, so here it is:
I agree with everyone who agrees that it is ok so long as people consent to it. Also, the age of consent in Canada is 14, for anyone who might not know, so therefore, while it might not be considered moral, anyone can marry/have sex with a 14 year old in Canada, as long as he/she consents.
__________________
I condone the responsible use of psychoactives. There is more to reality than you have confronted. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |