U.S. students say press freedoms go too far (attending, America)

[Rex]

Yahoo! News

Mon Jan 31, 7:20 AM ET

USATODAY.com
By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY

One in three U.S. high school students say the press ought to be more restricted, and even more say the government should approve newspaper stories before readers see them, according to a survey being released today.

The survey of 112,003 students finds that 36% believe newspapers should get "government approval" of stories before publishing; 51% say they should be able to publish freely; 13% have no opinion.

Asked whether the press enjoys "too much freedom," not enough or about the right amount, 32% say "too much," and 37% say it has the right amount. Ten percent say it has too little.

The survey of First Amendment rights was commissioned by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and conducted last spring by the University of Connecticut. It also questioned 327 principals and 7,889 teachers.

The findings aren't surprising to Jack Dvorak, director of the High School Journalism Institute at Indiana University in Bloomington. "Even professional journalists are often unaware of a lot of the freedoms that might be associated with the First Amendment," he says.

The survey "confirms what a lot of people who are interested in this area have known for a long time," he says: Kids aren't learning enough about the First Amendment in history, civics or English classes. It also tracks closely with recent findings of adults' attitudes.

"It's part of our Constitution, so this should be part of a formal education," says Dvorak, who has worked with student journalists since 1968.

Although a large majority of students surveyed say musicians and others should be allowed to express "unpopular opinions," 74% say people shouldn't be able to burn or deface an American flag as a political statement; 75% mistakenly believe it is illegal.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 1989 ruled that burning or defacing a flag is protected free speech. Congress has debated flag-burning amendments regularly since then; none has passed both the House and Senate.

Derek Springer, a first-year student at Ivy Tech State College in Muncie, Ind., credits his journalism adviser at Muncie Central High School with teaching students about the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech, press and religion.

Last year, Springer led a group of student journalists who exposed payments a local basketball coach made to players for such things as attending practices and blocking shots. The newspaper also questioned requirements that students register their cars with the school to get parking passes.

Because they studied the First Amendment, he says, "we know that we can publish our opinion, and that we might be scrutinized, but we know we didn't do anything wrong."

[Jaymes]

This is... distressing.

[Rex]

I almost cried. Just saddening.

[Lintu]

Government approval before publishing?!? Yikes. What's wrong with the kids these days? Something in the water? Or, is it just ignorance?

[Unedited]

I think this has to do with the fact that the a lot of things in the media today are just plain crap. Kids want the truth. Do they think government approval will give them that? I don't know. But I wouldn't call it a lack of understanding their constitutional rights, just a lack of caring so much. Many politians think their opinion is above the constitution, so why can't kids?

[Scuba Pete]

"There ought to be limits to freedom." Hey look, the trickle down theory works! Crap just keeps flowing downhill at an amazing speed.

[Feathers in Hair]

I know this has been my instinct in response to most political articles lately, but I feel it's valid:

*whimpers* NetDoc, Rex, Jensa, Sunstone, SOGFPP, TVOR? Anyone? Can I hide behind you for awhile?

[Ceridwen018]

Now, I abhor censorship, but think of this: A celver war ploy used by the Iraqis to get messages to the American people has been to capture American soldiers, and film them reading the message. The Iraqis know that the US media will eat this kind of thing up--exactly as they planned. If the government was able to step in and forbid the media from showing those videos, then that would quickly become an inefficient way of getting messages to American citizens, and therefore the Iraqis would have one less reason to capture American soldiers.

Do you see what I'm saying? Although putting limits on the media is a very tricky business, and I would never want to be the one in charge of that committee, do you guys agree that sometimes the media does more harm than good?

[No*s]

I echo most people's sentiment here...this is disturbing.

[Sunstone]

Ceridwen, the press does do some harm, but overall it does much good. I don't see how you or anyone else could put a stop to the harm it does without also putting a stop to the good it does.