![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Logic is all fine and good (although it's a tool, not some goal in life, I should hope), if you're being completely logical about it. Humans tend not to be. We'll twist stuff, forget to look at something, jump to conclusions, assume things (you have to assume to survive...say, assuming that bears are dangerous and getting the heck away is helpful, even if that particular bear you're looking at has no intention of attacking, so it's not always helpful to sit and think everything out, natural selection would select against that, not for it)...yes, I think the universe is logical, at some level, I just don't think we are.
__________________
צדק צדק תרדף למען תחיה |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.
__________________
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Logic has an end...reality(God) has no end....
http://www.miskatonic.org/godel.html Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem In 1931, the Czech-born mathematician Kurt Gödel demonstrated that within any given branch of mathematics, there would always be some propositions that couldn't be proven either true or false using the rules and axioms ... of that mathematical branch itself. You might be able to prove every conceivable statement about numbers within a system by going outside the system in order to come up with new rules and axioms, but by doing so you'll only create a larger system with its own unprovable statements. The implication is that all logical system of any complexity are, by definition, incomplete; each of them contains, at any given time, more true statements than it can possibly prove according to its own defining set of rules. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |