![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
What does Freedom of Speech mean to you, and where should you have that right?
__________________
"A difference of opinion does not mean a difference of principle." - Thomas Jefferson |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
In my opinion Freedom Of Speech means that you can say anything to anyone, anywhere without any repercussions or consequences. In another of my opinions we should have this right or freedom where we need it the most- at our jobs.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Most people who fixate on Freedom of Speech have forgotten the Freedom of Thought.
__________________
On sabbatical until things become fun again.
Reach me at NetDoc@ScubaBoard.com or on www.ScubaBoard.com. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I am an atheist. Therefore, all comments I make about God are hypothetical. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
. I can think whatever I want, and unless I open my mouth, I can't be punished for it.OTOH, there are some thoughts that can't occur to me unless I have access to the requisite information, and those thoughts are dependent on Freedom of Speech.
__________________
And besides...your pulse canons ruined my bunny slippers. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Rex,
Quote[What does Freedom of Speech mean to you, and where should you have that right?] I seem to find myself replying to a lot of threads with a poor view of mankind; I was happy to join this forum, to be, hopefully with like-minded people. So far, I haven't been disappointed; I have 'taken' to quite a few members with whom I could empathise etc....... Freedom of speech to me means that anyone can say whatever they like, whenevr they feel like it. Where should you have that right?- I would immediately say 'where I know that whatever I say will offend no one' in answer. The trouble with a theoretical ideal, such as 'freedom of speech', is that such Ideas come about as a result of oppression and the forbidding of freedom of speech. As with all matters in life, once people campaign hard to overturn a social injustice, the momentum created by their efforts often carry the good original idea past a point which is acceptable, and once that happens, people take advantage and abuse the gift. I don't know if it is the same for you, where you live, but a characteristic of this is obvious with the idal of 'anti-racist' principles. Of course I fully endorse the Idea that we should not be prejudiced by coulour, sex-orientation, whatever else......., but have you noticed, that , for example, here in the UK, I am forbidden to use cetain words that might offend a black person, the same principle is noot applied to the black person in relation to me.................? ![]()
__________________
My life is an open book; if you don't like the read, put me back on the shelf ....................
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
And besides...your pulse canons ruined my bunny slippers. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It is designated a freedom because, in some cases, it can be contolled by the state. It is not protected speech when the expression would be of imminent danger to others or to the speaker (I am talkng about incitement and "fighting words"). An illustration - a crowd in the park hears the words "Let's get those Catholics" (protected speech). A crowd on the way to a Catholic church, while carrying clubs and torches, hears "Let's get those Catholics" (again. protected speech). The crowd standing before the church doors while carring torches and clubs hears "Let's get those Catholics" and at this point the speech is not longer proteced by the First Amendment. The imminence of the danger is the discriminating factor. The police power of the state may be used at this point. While it may be used "on the march" it would not be a constitutional exercise of power to prohibit the speech but of some other nature. While in the park, the police power must be used to protect the speakers. When the speaker is threatened, the police may remove the speaker if the words can be consider "fighting words" to a hostile crowd. I have tried to confine the illustration to points dealing with expression - there may well be other "crimes" occurring that warrant the use of police power throughout the scenario. "Fire" yelled in a movie theater is not protected speech unless, in fact, there is a fire. That utterance is of such magnitude in the circumstances that immediate danger from a false panic is of more concern then the accommodation of free speech. Burning the American flag is free speech for it is the expression of a political statement. Burning a draft card is not considered political free speech because the card is the property of the state.
__________________
It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God - but to create him.
Arthur C. Clarke We have created some but they sure weren't an intelligent design. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|