Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Everything But the Kitchen Sink / General Debates
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-22-2004, 10:49 AM
Runt's Avatar
Runt Offline
Religion: UU-naturalism/humanism
Title:Uber Member
Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Arizona
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,830
Frubals: 154145
Runt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond repute
Runt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Spinkles
Does the government even draft women, (athsma or not)? I was not aware that women had ever been drafted into combat or were even eligible, but correct me if I'm wrong.
In the past women have not been drafted. However, this particular bill is considering drafting women as well, either into military or civilian service: "A bill to provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes." (WHAT other purposes?) http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdqu...p;summ2=m&

Quote:
But wouldn't you still be aiding and supporting the killing of other people indirectly?
Perhaps, or perhaps not. It is preferable to killing people because at least there is a chance I won't be helping kill people (I could, for example, be helping figure out ways to raise money to feed people... I don't know. Service for the furtherance of national defense does not necessarily have to have anything to do with agression). It doesn't mean I like ANY compulsory service... but I certainly would prefer to work in a capacity that does not directly involve killing people.
__________________
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face -forever.-GEORGE ORWELL
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-26-2004, 02:25 PM
Mr Spinkles's Avatar
Mr Spinkles Offline
Religion: None
Title:Staff
Humor Award:  - Issue reason:  Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 6,086
Frubals: 1653708
Mr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal Whore
Mr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal Whore
Mr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal WhoreMr Spinkles is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runt
In the past women have not been drafted. However, this particular bill is considering drafting women as well, either into military or civilian service: "A bill to provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes." (WHAT other purposes?) http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdqu...p;summ2=m&
It seems very doubtful that such a bill would ever get through both houses of the legislature, but I guess it is possible.

Do you think it is right or wrong that women cannot be drafted? Is the military sexist, or realistic?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-26-2004, 02:35 PM
Runt's Avatar
Runt Offline
Religion: UU-naturalism/humanism
Title:Uber Member
Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Arizona
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,830
Frubals: 154145
Runt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond repute
Runt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond reputeRunt has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I actually think it is right. Women demand equal rights... well, with equal rights must come equal responsibility. My only concern is that technically women are at a SLIGHT disadvantage physically, which could put them in GREATER danger than men in a military conflict... therefore, and for this reason only, I think women, if drafted, should be given the choice between combatant (military) and noncombatant (military or civilian) service.
__________________
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face -forever.-GEORGE ORWELL
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-28-2004, 03:17 PM
UNITED Offline
Title:Freshman Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Baker, Lousiana
Posts: 19
Frubals: 10
UNITED is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I don't necessarily believe in war. Only defend yourself, don't go lookng for a fight. Make peace or love, not hate. But with the draft, if it did happen, I would think that they would have to draft women. That would only be fair. Women are equal to men in society, so they should carry equal the burden. If I was drafted, and I didn't protest, I would be ****** off that I got drafted, yet some physically fit woman did not have to be drafted into some military situation. And so would anyone else.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-28-2004, 04:28 PM
Lightkeeper Offline
Title:Uber Member
Journal Award:  - Issue reason:  Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 4,638
Frubals: 14203
Lightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to allLightkeeper is a name known to all
Default

I think we have to be careful about drafting a lot of young woman, because of childbearing. A large loss of young women in war would highly affect propagation.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Similar Threads


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 AM.


© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.