|
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
04-20-2008, 09:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
*Guarantee not guaranteed.
__________________
Artificial Life on your PC 
|
|
#32
04-20-2008, 09:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
 Don't fence me in.
|
|
#33
04-20-2008, 09:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
And if you're at all a regular user of YouTube, you're undoubtedly aware that Hoff even once took upon himself a mortal coil for a lama sabachthani moment.
__________________
Don't fence me in.
|
|
#34
04-20-2008, 09:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Contrary to what most people say, the most dangerous animal in the world is not the lion or the tiger or even the elephant. It's a shark riding on an elephant's back, just trampling and eating everything they see.
|
|
#35
04-20-2008, 11:22 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Possible means "in the set". Its meaning varies depending on the upper limit of that set. For example, if we are talking of physical possibility then we mean "in the set constrained by the laws of nature". If we mean logical possibility then we mean "in the set constrained by the laws of logic".
Clearly, if we cannot provide an account of the upper limit of our set then "possible" does not mean anything in this context. However, it could be that the set is limitless in which case everything would be possible. Impossible is therefore anything that is greater than the upper limit of the relevant set. Under this understanding, "the impossible" (meaning the attribute of impossibility) is clearly possible because it would still be contained within the set. If it were not contained within the set then the object it is describing would not be impossible. On the other hand "the impossible" (meaning the object of impossibility) must reside outside of the set and so cannot itself be possible.
__________________
|
|
#36
04-20-2008, 12:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Either there are things that may be impossible, or there aren't. If there are, we can answer "yes" to your question right away. If no situations exist in which it is possible that something is impossible, then a situation in which it is possible that something is impossible is itself impossible. This would mean that there is at least one thing that is impossible in at least one situation, which would mean that the answer to your question would be "yes". So... either way, the answer is "yes" (though possibly paradoxically so). However, after reading this thread, I'm thinking about changing my answer from "yes" to "David Hasselhoff".
|
|
#37
04-20-2008, 01:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
possible impossible, impossible possible....just made me post this:
YouTube - Impossible Becomes Possible and no, it's not Hoff singing 
__________________
Some people are like Slinkies. They serve no real function but sure are fun to watch tumble down the stairs.
|
|
#38
04-21-2008, 05:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Okay I'm calling it.
B.S topic.
__________________
BRICK WALLS ARE THERE FOR A REASON: TO PROVE HOW BAD WE WANT SOMETHING.
< |
