![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
In the concept of conservative solipsism (I know, an oxymoron) posited by Bertrand Russell, it is believed that humanity creates their own subjective versions of reality based on "sense data" we receive and process. While not ruling out the possibilities of other, independent existences outside of our own mind, aspects of our conceptual universe are created and subsequently given logical (through our mind's notions of it) grounds for existence. How would we know "hot" without "cold," and so forth.
When someone is under the influence of psychotropic drugs that alter brain chemistry (such as MDMA, tetrahydracannibinol, LSD, etc.), they are apt to perceive differently - i.e. new "versions" of reality through hightened levels of awareness, in some cases. It's known that throughout religious history, drugs have been used to become "closer" to God/nature/the soul etc. So here's an idea... Since we've conditioned ourself to perceive our version of reality through an infinite series of subjective sense data, extending the unknown out with logical inductions (for example, if you've never been to Paris, you would assume it would look like the pictures you've seen), then it could be assumed that through the use of drugs, we open avenues of perception (and reality) that would otherwise be closed. I think of this concept through the "electromagnetic spectrum" metaphor. Since it's publication, we've discovered that we're only experiencing a tiny, tiny microcosm of what we can now term as "real." Any thoughts?
__________________
I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong. -Bertrand Russell
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
And on a sem-related note, here's Philip and Neale's recipe for "Goodness Fudge:"
Ingredients: 1 Golden Oreo, broken in half. 1 Nestle Crunch Ice Cream "Dip" Procedure: Consume half of Golden Oreo quickly followed by Nestle Crunch Ice Cream "Dip." Repeat until supply of both ingredients are gone.
__________________
I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong. -Bertrand Russell
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some drugs, properly administered, do appear to induce a genuine transcendant experience.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
By this understanding of reality, how do we know if we are getting closer to or further from the truth?
__________________
MySpace Page |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong. -Bertrand Russell
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
By the large, I suppose it could be that since we create our own realities, we also create our own truths within them.
__________________
I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong. -Bertrand Russell
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
MySpace Page Last edited by Radio Frequency X; 12-31-2006 at 11:33 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
To the top! Any other thoughts?
I'd like to explore possibilities within perennial philosophies for conscious, drug-aided mindfullness...on the forums, rather! ![]()
__________________
I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong. -Bertrand Russell
|
|
#10
|
||||
|