![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
"James Barker agreed to the plea deal at the start of his court-martial in the US to avoid the death penalty, his civilian lawyer said."
cnn news reports: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6152118.stm How do you feel about stories like these? Should the soliders be held to the crimminal laws of the USA or Iraq in times of war and if so should the penalities be different or the same as comparied to civilians who commit the same crimes? Should a trial for the death of Iraq citizens by foreign servicemen be conducted in Iraq or the USA ? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"If a lion could talk, you wouldn't understand him" - Plagiarism |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
UN courts would not work. But countries party to an international process could be signatories to a treaty authorising trial process on war crimes. I see no reason why punishments should not be those of the state the defendent represents at the time of committing the crime and it should be served/carried out there. If the death penalty is the result, this is a domestic matter. The defendent as a citizen of the said country has an opportunity to change this state of affairs by influencing public opinion at home. I do not see countries without modern independent legal systems where law reform is possible being willing signatories to a treaty arrangement that would reform trial process for war crimes within an international framework.
__________________
"If a lion could talk, you wouldn't understand him" - Plagiarism |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
IN nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen. "Love is the beauty of the soul." - Saint Augustine |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I saw this yesterday, but didn't bring it up. I knew it would make its way here sooner or later.
Anyway... I believe that the US legal system, particularly the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) is more than capable of handling the matter. If he were a civilian I would say let the Government of the victim handle things, but since he was acting as a representative of the US then the US should handle it. However, I don't see any reason why the Iraq Govt. shouldn't be able to go after the US Govt. for issues like this. But I’m not exactly a Foreign Policy expert so I'm going to go ahead and make my ignorance known.
__________________
Lets agree to respect each others veiws, no matter how wrong your's may be. Last edited by Rejected; 11-16-2006 at 10:22 AM. Reason: Typos |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
In which country did these crimes take place?
I think it's a matter of jurisdiction.
__________________
Break free from the cave! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
It happened in Iraq
Here's a link. http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/16/ira....ap/index.html
__________________
Lets agree to respect each others veiws, no matter how wrong your's may be. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bear in mind that these guys if (when) convicted will be spending the rest of their lives not in a federal penal institute, but in military prison, which is much, much worse.
__________________
Lets agree to respect each others veiws, no matter how wrong your's may be. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
rhetorical question
__________________
Break free from the cave! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |