Gay Bomb?! (homosexuality, pray, sexuality)

[SoliDeoGloria]

I heard about this a couple of months ago on a radio program and could not help but laugh. I have wanted to start a thread about this but haven't really had the time until now to do it. I don't know if this has been discussed already here, but here we go.

As funny as this may sound, the U.S. military has actually considered looking into developing various chemical type weapons which also included a "gay bomb" which allegedly could turn enemy soldiers irresistibly, sexually attracted towards one another. The best part is if one decided to look it up: http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...:en&q=gay+bomb , the hilarity doesn't stop there. Other considered ideas included weapons that made enemies more recognizable by their bad breath, etc.

As funny as this is to me, I can't help but wonder what the response would be to such a subject in here. Take for instance, what implications a "gay bomb" would have on the issue of homosexuality altogether. Anyways, what say you about this?

Sincerely,
SoliDeogloria

[Scuba Pete]

What those wacky war mongers won't conjure up next?

[CaptainXeroid]

Um...this is quite an interesting find. I guess the 'Gay Agenda' we've been hearing about involves a lot more than milk, and I can only imagine what effect "Don't ask don't tell" will have.

I hate to think with all the serious things going on that our government even gave these ideas a first thought. I guess since this dates back to 1994 it will take some serious spinning to blame it on George W Bush.

[Mike182]

i think someone else is dreaming about playing God.......

In one sentence of the document it was suggested that a strong aphrodisiac could be dropped on enemy troops, ideally one which would also cause "homosexual behaviour". The aphrodisiac weapon was described as "distasteful but completely non-lethal". In its "New Discoveries Needed" section, the document implicitly acknowledges that no such chemicals are actually known. It is not known whether this chemical has been developed further. The document also included many other off-beat ideas, such as spraying enemy troops with bee pheromones and then hiding numerous beehives in the combat area.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bomb

[jamaesi]

I would much rather a war be fought with gay sex than killing, that's for sure.

Less death, more fun that way.

[Ciscokid]

I can see Iraqi soldiers now, instead of their typical battle garb, they'd be running around in thongs, elf boots and feather boas armed with rocket propelled poppers.

[Bishka]

Originally Posted by Ciscokid

I can see Iraqi soldiers now, instead of their typical battle garb, they'd be running around in thongs, elf boots and feather boas armed with rocket propelled poppers.

I needed that.

[angellous_evangellous]

Originally Posted by SoliDeoGloria

I heard about this a couple of months ago on a radio program and could not help but laugh. I have wanted to start a thread about this but haven't really had the time until now to do it. I don't know if this has been discussed already here, but here we go.

As funny as this may sound, the U.S. military has actually considered looking into developing various chemical type weapons which also included a "gay bomb" which allegedly could turn enemy soldiers irresistibly, sexually attracted towards one another. The best part is if one decided to look it up: http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...:en&q=gay+bomb , the hilarity doesn't stop there. Other considered ideas included weapons that made enemies more recognizable by their bad breath, etc.

As funny as this is to me, I can't help but wonder what the response would be to such a subject in here. Take for instance, what implications a "gay bomb" would have on the issue of homosexuality altogether. Anyways, what say you about this?

Sincerely,
SoliDeogloria

I heard about this. I thought that it was originally developed back in the early 1990s in the first Gulf War.

Sounds like a great idea to me... it hurts the enemy's will to fight and would save lives on both sides.