![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have always considered Insurance to be the biggest scam to have ever hit humanity. Just looking at some basic tenets of it like:
1. Collect money from people based on the idea that they will help people out in troubling times. 2. Make it extremely hard for people to get money back in troubling times and raise payments when people do despite the fact that they have already put a lot of money in. 3. Get laws passed that make it mandatory for everybody to carry insurance for various things. For the general public, insurance is nothing but a lose lose situation. If insurance companie's gave out more money than they took in, they would ofcourse be out of business, so the objective is to take more money than give out and they do this exceptionally well. With that being noted, one nagging thought that pops in my mind is how much the Insurance aspect truly plays a role in the issue of Homosexual Marriages. It is no secret, although it is not discussed half as much as other aspects surrounding this issue, that insurence, especially health insurance, is a pretty major issue when it come to Homosexual Marriages due to the fact that Health Insurance companies give discount rates for families, more so than individuals. I truly wonder how much money insurance companies stand to lose if Homosexual Marriages were recognized on a national scale in the U.S.. I would need to do some research on this but I wonder how many other counties that have leaglized same sex marriage have government run health insurance as opposed to private health insurance? I wouldn't be suprised in the least to find that a majority of the counties that have legalized same sex marriage do indeed have government run health insurance. And to state that insurance companies have legislatures in their pockets would not be to illogical of a conclusion given the facts in the U.S.. To further emphasize this point I can almost swear that I heard on the radio about two straight men who got married in the U.S. to recieve insurance discounts. I tried to look for the article but couldn't find it. With this being noted I wonder how strong of an aspect Insurance truly is when it comes to the issue of same sex marriages in the U.S. as opposed to the religious aspect. And yet the concentration seems to be on the religious aspect. There have been many deaths and wars fought because of agenda's hidden by religious convictions played upon the general public by various leaders. While, as a Christian, I have taken a stand on the issue of homosexuality due to religious conviction, I can't help but wonder if the same has happened in this issue due to insurance company agendas and if that is the case, I wonder why more hasn't been stated about this aspect? Are both side just being side tracked here to avoid the real issues? That would make more sense to me than religious oppression in this day and age in the U.S.. Sincerely, SoliDeoGloria
__________________
"Those convinced against their will hold the same opinions still." Unknown |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Practical issues, like hospital visitation, inherentance rights and access to health insurance should take precendent on the political scene because they can be addressed by politics. Issues like the recognition of unions with particular churches cannot and should not be addressed by politics... due to the separation of church and state.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm surprised that more companies don't currently offer the same types of benefits to same-sex partners.
You have to realize that Insurance Companies can't just charge whatever they want for their products. You need to take into account the probability of a loss, as well as the probability of how large of a loss it is, factor in investment income, add some for profit, and charge as little as possible in order to be competative. Most of the discounts are there because there is some evidence that the reason for the discount (i.e. being married), has some effect on either the frequency or the severity of a loss. I don't know if there have been many studies on same-sex couples in this reguard, so I couldn't tell you if there should be a discount or not. If they are a safer risk, then a company would be stupid not to offer the discount and get the business. The government doesn't have to get involved at all, although it probably will.
__________________
"In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." -- Ayn Rand
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some companies extend health insurance to partners.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I work in Life Insurance - well, currently in Long Term Care Insurrance - so I don't know a whole lot about how Health insurance and Property and Casualty insurance work. As far as I can tell, my company doens't offer a discount to same sex partners - and I don't know that it has been looked into much. From a business standpoint, if there is a smaller risk, they should be charged less. We'll have to see what the future holds.
__________________
"In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." -- Ayn Rand
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The basic idea behind insurance was good. It worked something like this, originally: say ten families lived in a small mining community, and each of the families is completely dependent upon a single bread-winner for their survival. If something were to happen to that single bread-winner, the whole family would quickly become broke and lose everything. And no individual family could save up enough to protect themselves from such a disaster.
However, they know that such a disaster is likely to only occur to one of the ten families in a ten year period, so the families get together and create a pool of emergency money for whichever family it happens to. And it's good fro everyone. Each family only has to contribute one tenth of the money needed, which they can afford, and in return they all have the security of knowing that if it's their family that is struck by the loss of the bread-winner, they will not lose everything. This was the beginning of "life insurance". Unfortunately, insurance has become a "for profit" business, instead of a community trust, and so the goal has become the "profit" rather than the protection that the insurance offers to the participants. In the pursuit of these profits, insurance companies now try not to pay out to those who need the money if they can help it, and so they actually use the money they take in to hire lawyers and lobbyists to help them deny responsibility for paying claims. They also have become so rich and powerful that they can bribe politicians to write laws forcing us to buy their dishonest insurance, so they can cheat us even further. This has become epidemic in America, and is strangling businesses (who are struggling to pay outrageous insurance premiums) and costing us jobs and productivity, as well as holding down wages. The idea of insurance itself was a great idea, and still is. But sadly, as with everything else in America, greed has completely replaced any sense of community service as the goal of commercial enterprise, and the result is that we are collapsing economically. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." -- Ayn Rand
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But in the last thirty years or so, insurance companies have routinely posted massive profits. Meanwhile, the cost of insurance goes up, and the pay-outs dwindle. There is a correlation, here. Of course the insurance companies claim this is because of massive fraud (that they are the victims), but what would you expect them to say; that it's because they are greedy and wanted massive profits at the expense of their fellow citizens? The truth is that they have gained massive profits in recent decades. So the supposed "fraud" couldn't have been hurting them too much. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have helped price variable annuities - there isn't a huge window that you can be profitable and competative.
__________________
"In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." -- Ayn Rand
|
|
#10
|
||
|